oh bTW LK, though your "greatest track ever" got laughed at for a week straight, i know you still somehow believe you're nice on the mic. so...you can feel free to set up that audio battle any day now. I know you left when I first said it, and now you seemed to have conveniently forgotten, so consider this your not-so-friendly reminder.

now pretend to not know what i'm talkin about.

I dare you.


so I can shit on you. AGAIN.

BTW. Dipshit. I wasn't even on this board 2 years ago, so how could I have told Q ANYTHING 2 years ago??

see why it's stupid for me to argue with morons?


dipshit.

but if you're dumb enough to believe him LMAO go right ahead.

...sorry dude,i dont battle on the internet anymore,i'm sure i've said this a million times son.......
nice on the mic? hmmm i've done audios for 3 weeks in my life with a pc mic....u actually think i care what anyone thinks about it?
lyrically i've beatin anyone remotely good,n thats from just clownin around.............i'm not the one who claims to be a rapper but sucks cock on the mic

it's amazing how many beef threads by Q and Apexx and mad dog about same thing today. there is a beef forum for this type of stuff you know ~_~

apexx is 35...shit..whts next...madogg is his son?....

lol



possibly







1

So Q, when are you going to stop ignoring every time someone completely dashes every argument by stubbornyl sticking to shit like 'You're alway gonna be in the V club'. That's not a little sad to you?

I don't comprehend your question. Come again.












1

Okay. When are you going to stop browsing over people's points and not addressing them, and keep repeating insults that have time and time again been proven false? You've proven that I was right by comparing you to LK, even though you had to pester me in AIM to inflate your ego once more by having me concede the point to get rid of you.

People don't acknowledge logic on RV, in general. If someone types 2 paragraphs of "points", it doesn't make sense for me to rebuff or repudiate those points when the typical response is to respond with more naysay. Therefore, my responses are resonsive, not provocative. Also, their "points" are usually just pejoratives and derogatory statements anyway. I rarely find logic in what my critics say. It amounts to Q bashing, which they are entitled to do. But, I don't have to entertain it. So, I entertain myself.


Does that answer your question?

It does answer the question, thanks.

^^^You're quite welcome. I respond to logic.














1

Q are you saying being a virgin is a bad thing? *has a shitload of responses for you no matter what you say*

Yea...I'm bustin the kids balls for being a virgin...But, that's like bustin someone's balls for being short, or too skinny, or too w/e...

Honestly, it's not bad to be a virgin. I'm abstainate right now by choice. I've decided to focus on other things right now. So, being a virgin isn't bad.

My issue with Mim and anyone else I "crack on" is that I don't come at them like that unprovoked. I told you, I'm responsive. I mirror. So, if Mim comes at me like "You're a Faggot LOSER"...blah blah...Do you honestly think I'm going to respond to him like, "Yes, and to answer your question, blah blah"...


??

I think you all have confused the i-net with the real world. No one would ever come at me like that and honestly expect me to oblige them seriously.


^^So, I crack on him. I really couldn't care less about anyone on here and if they're a virgin or not. It doesn't phase me.


1

bra if you talk like this in real life the only time poeple wouldnt laugh at u is in english class but why you gotta speak all proper online..it aint like u in front of some cops or something...damn

lk's back? fuck, well it was fun while it lasted