have faith in q's ability to dodge questions man. he'll come up with some way he can avoid that too, believe me.

What the fuck, Q? How can you dismiss the possibilitly that Jesus may have been married? The comparison you used was that maybe Jesus was gay. Being gay is a sin according to the church. . being married isn't. You're fucking retarded, man.

^^Only Q would say Jesus coulda been gay.

prolly another fantasy mixing with reality again

Man... I've straight up had enough of the q....

To be honest with ya...

The guys a brainwashed moron who has developed a bias for any belief or properganda the church puts out, and he doesent wanna know about anything else, no matter how much more credible the sources are.

I'm sick of his ignorance.....

Tha Q: http://www.google.com/search?source...n+homosexual%3F

:) Heh. Not to blaspheme or anything, I just found that pretty funny that it is considered a possibility.

Anyway, as for the Mary Magdalene thing...it doesn't change much, unless Jesus was celibate, but there is a heated discussion on that matter. If that is the case, yes, it would be important.

Locknes, why are you even bringing up the nephilim? The angels were ANGELS, and they weren't supposed to have sex with humans because they were not set on Earth to do so. Jesus was not an angel, he was a man albeit the son of God, and saying the same rules of the nephilim apply to Jesus is about as equally correct as saying Americans live by the same rules as Ethiopians. The nephilim blatantly went against God by fornicating with maidens, whereas Jesus most likely would've had the blessings of God if he got married. I doubt Jesus was suffering a good old case of hormonal imbalance where he thought that God didn't know what was right.

Q..

Open your fuckin' eyes dude.

see? tolja.


someoen else quoted it and he STILL dodged it. See, he's a certified bitch son. once his argument starts to fall apart, he's gone.