Well either way im gettin both just to have.....i dont stick wit one system but anyways I still think X-box 360 mite be ownin this Generations cuz im hearing shyt that you can get you hardware upgraded

All thats about is buying another hard drive. If you choose to buy the 360 without a hard drive, you can buy the hard drive seperately. And it ends up being more expensive than it would have been if you just bought the 360 with the hard drive.

XBOX 360 will own PS3

reason...
its simple really, Microsoft has more power behind them, the Xbox was a lot more powerful than the PS2 was, and thus the games that were made could hold more. the same thing will apply with the next generation, xbox will have more power and their games will look more realistic and be more in-depth.

Multi-Console Games will sell better on the XBOX because the fact is they look visually better, for new gamers it may be unnoticeable, but for those who've been gaming their whole life almost it shows up, games run smoother on xbox and look better, also with a lot of them the xbox tends to include extras that other consoles dont have, reason for that is they can hold more without losing the visual/sound/gameplay quality.

and as for games that will be for one console only, xbox again will win because they can make games more realistic and a lot more in depth and more fun to play.

look at Halo and Halo 2.......they own the fuck out of any FPS game that PS2 has...

^^ did you not read what everyone else said in the other posts?

^^ .....nope :D

lol go read up.. then you'll see why ps3 will shit on the new x box :shoot:

fuck that shit

xbox owns all

i hate playstations.....they are wack

booooo!.... there aint no decent games ou for the xbox and the controller is massive... i sitll havent got used to the controls

i'm well used to xbox controllers

playstation ones just seem awkward to me now

i be playin Far Cry on xbox now, making my levels on it n shit
its fuckin dope!!

omg fool -_-

PS3's specs are miles ahead of the Xbox 360's. Go read other things ive said.

Xbox 360 has 3 CPU cores (CPU cores do all the processing that games require... without them, games would still be looking like nes games)... the PS2 and first Xbox had 2 CPU cores. PS3 has 7... more than twice the processing power of the Xbox 360.

Also, the PS3's actual graphics hardware is more advanced than the Xbox 360s... its all in the hardware specs.

And another thing, the Xbox 360 is still using DVD technology to put their games on. Thats about 4GB of data, or maybe 6-7GB on a dual layer DVD. The PS3 is using blu-ray technology, which is about 50GB+.

So basically, your whole argument on which console was gonna be better is void. Because your reasoning means that PS3 will in fact be a better console.

Ive looked at halo and halo 2... on my computer... theyre alright, but DOD source, half life 2, call of duty 2, F.E.A.R, and doom 3 own the fuck out of the halo series.

Look at MGS2&3, all the final fantasy's, jak n daxter, tekken, dead or alive, grand theft auto, gran turismo, devil may cry... need I go on? (which I easily could)

I Hope that Blu Ray doesnt Sky Rocket Games Prices.

It probably wont. I think itll be the same as PS2 games when they first come out... or maybe a tiny bit more.

Probly. I dont like spendin over £30 on a single game tho.

werd...30 pounds is a lot of money

<-(doesnt have any idea how much a pound is)

i think they'll start off at like £45-£50 or suttin

lmao... --__-- .

doesnt PS3 have like 8 controller slots or sumthin??????????

Nah... its got... 7?

Pretty wierd number of controllers to have... its not even even. But it beats the 360's 2 controllers.

lol fuck you all nintendo revolution OWNS one...........

yer word loool, PS3 kills the 360 in almost every way in my opinion. metal gear 4's gonna be amazin!

But thats a totally different ball game. They would actually prefer not to be compared to Sony and Microsoft, even though its inevitable.

But I do see where you're coming from. Personally, depending on launch titles, ill pick up a revolution before I get a PS3...

yeh they got wireless controllers :D:D..Dope!!!!!!!!

So does the PS3 and 360...

The rev just has a sick new innovative controller... which is why its so dope.

shut up -_-*gets angry*DONT SPOIL MY FUN!!!!*cries*

*spoils more fun* .................

stop it.......*cries till tears dry up* *crys again**sniff*

360 > PS3

Why? Because it comes out a year earlier.

I still think X-box 360 got PS3. I been seeing alotta people who work for Microsoft at EB games and shyt who stocking up and making orders for X-box 360 and they explainning a whole lot of shit about 360. Basicly from what they are telling me....not word from word cuz i cant remember word from word. Yeah every pc got a CPU proccessor so does these game systems. PS3 and X-box graphics are pretty much gonna be just about equal. PS3 pretty much needs them 7 proccessors to run them graphics for the system. While X-box 360 got just them 3 cpu proccessors and the graphics run smoothly and are just as good as PS3 maybe even better in the long run as games start to develope more. But the difference is That PS3 is most likely to burn out its proccessors supporting the power for PS3 with graphics cuz its only using proccessors. While X-box will most likely last longer due to its State of the Art graphic chips that are in the 360 wich will most likely take CPU proccessors a few years to even catch up with the chip. Games are swaying a little bit more favor with PS3 i do agree because they are showcasing there best titles and franchise. While X-box 360 is going with neq Franchises and new Titles. We already seen Kill Zone 2 and MGS4 graphics and yeah they a beautiful as hell. So far X-box 360 graphics has just been as beautiful as well. With new franchises with game engines that they just build and havent had a chance to improve on yet. But with PS3 games such as Tekken and Metal Gear and Final fantasy they have been improving on them Game engines for years. .............damn i forgot what i was gonna say......Basicly im gonna say this
X-box 360 is gonna be more powerful. But basicly is gonna be put on Gamers Opinions. Weather you like X-box or Playstation more.


But my opinnion is X-box 360>PS3. Due to i like shooter games better. I like the X-box controller. and it comes out sooner. And plus If you PS3 breaks down like crticily and you need some serious help. I hope yall know or got a Japanses Translator to help you with you technical support Problems.


GET X-BOX 360 FOR THE GREAT PATRIOTIC CAUSE. BUY THE AMERICAN SYSTEM

Revelation: Yeah, thats microsofts sick marketing. It just might get them ahead in sales, but that mos def does not mean the 360 is a better console.



lmao @ you trying to talk like you know what you're talking about.

First of all, graphically the PS3 kills the 360. Even a PC could run games as good as the 360. And the 360 has 3 CPU cores + a Graphics processing unit.. PCs have 1 CPU and a graphics processing unit and can run games just as nicely.

PS3 has a BETTER GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT. That is, a BETTER graphics card than the 360 does. That, as well as its huge processing power (7 CPU cores instead of 3) mean it has the ability to display graphics that are a lot better than the 360's.

Ive already explained all of this... The reason why games on the 360 look almost as good, or even the same, as PS3 games do at the moment is because the PS3's technology is way to advanced... no programmer has had any experience programming for 7 CPU cores... its very difficult. As soon as they learn to use the systems power, the games graphics will get better and better over time.

The 360 only has 3 CPU cores... everyone knows how to program amazingly for only 3, because its pretty much the same amount as last generation consoles had.

So microsofts take on the next generation, is basically to change the graphics of their games slightly. Which is the american way. Do jack shit, and get paid to the shtihouse for it.

As opposed to the japanese culture, which has been full of hard working people for thousands of years, that push the boundaries of technology and development. Sony has created a console that is too advanced for today to handle... expecting it to be fully used in the NEXT GENERATION. Go figure..

When it comes to shit like this, Japan owns America. How many times has windows fucked up on your computer? ... Plenty for me. Just shows how sick microsoft are at making products. Things like appliances and TVs and shit that are made in japan own american made shit.

360>ps3 just because it comes out before lol

Not really...

PS3>Xbox in technical terms.

because its not as good, word.

Ps3 > Xbox 360

im getting an x box on saturday :D

the only thing ps2/ps3 has that xbox/xbox360 doesent is more games other than that, the xbox owns, it has internal memory, it now comes with wireless 802.11g access, well the ps3 does also but seeing as xbox is created by microsoft, im pretty damn sure it will be better, the xbox 360 comes WITH wireless controllers, and you can hook it up to your computer/laptop as an accessorie, im not gonna go into detail cuz i dont feel like it, as for the revolution the controller is gay as fuck it looks like a fucking dvd remote with an analog stick, and an add on where you can hold the anolog stick in your other hand WTF!!!!! plus the nintendo revolution looks gay itself, the thing i like about ps3 is their controller is gonna be usb, so i can use them for my computer games and emulators :-)

nintento revolution controller----->http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3143782

Every computer system of any kind has internal memory.

The xbox360 comes in two forms, one with a hard drive and one without... and the ps3 has a hard-drive as well. Soo.. you know whats funny? If they hack the ps3, and theres good enough coders out there, technically they could get an xbox360 emulator going on ps3. It wouldnt work the other way round though, because of the PS3 and Xbox's specs.

Just because microsoft makes the xbox, doesnt mean its wireless is better. The reason why the xbox will go well online is because of the xbox live network that microsoft developed with the old xbox. The thing is, most xbox games you can just play easier online using a computer... Its not the network, or the system that drives success online, its the games.

Think about the PS3's games online... shit like gran turismo, tekken, metal gear solid (which theyve already brought online with snake eater), and most of all GTA. Sony has got a lot of nice devs that will make some really good original online games as well.

360? Halo... perfect dark... ghost recon... maybe a few racing games. Shit lacks depth. Its first person shooters, which are ass to control, and racers which are cool. Sports games and the like will be on both xbox and ps3, so they dont count.

And I dont know wtf you're on about with the revolution controller. Im buying a revolution before a PS3 or Xbox, just because its so promising. The games they will make for it will be so fun to play.. not just boring old re-hashes with new graphics, and games by those devs that churn out a port for every console to make money. Do you have any idea how good that controller is? Obviously not... Imagine first person shooters.. control movement with the analog stick, point and shoot with the controller... just like PC but with a more accurate range of movement. Howbout a boxing game? One controller in each hand... to punch, you.............. punch. buttons on the controller for movement and dodging. RPG's would be good as well.

The applications of the new controller are endless... Its all up to the developers imagination. Xbox and playstation controllers are a burden to design control schemes for... X to do this, L1 to do that, hold down R1 and use the right analog stick to move the camera, holding this and that does this. Even with combinations theres a really limited number of actions that can be performed.

Nintendo owned that. Havent you noticed, nintendo know what theyre doing? Heres a timeline:

-Nintendo gets into gaming
-Nintendo makes a shitload of money
-Sony gets into gaming, makes a shitload of money
-Nintendo release console with good graphics, and their controller has an analog stick.
-Sony all of a sudden decide to release a controller with analog sticks.
-Every console from then has controllers with analog sticks, because they realise its easier to control with, and nintendo is smart.
-Sony and microsoft release consoles they had been working on for a long time.
-Nintendo churns out a random console to keep up with them, not really giving a shit.
-Meanwhile, nintendo is owning the handheld industry and making more profit than sony and nintendo are from playstation and xbox.
-Sony enters handheld industry.
-Sony makes console with better graphics, so does microsoft.
-Nintendo employs new control scheme on a console with better graphics.

Guess whats next?

-every console from then on uses a similar control scheme.

Its bound to happen... just watch. If you stick with your "the revolution is gay omfg dvd remote" atittude, you'll miss out on some great games...

fuck um both i want the psp but if i had too choose PS3

no the controllers pretty gay, and another thing about ps3 is i can use my psp as a controller, as for the revolution i hate its physical look, and the ps2 controller is gay to , and as for internal memory, the xbox is gonna have 100 gigs and over, even if ps3 had internal memory it doesent have THAT much, and because its made by microsoft will make the internet better, ive been on xbox live AND ps3 online, both broadban, xbox's connection was WAYY faster, also xbox graphics are wayyyy better, and it loads up wayyy faster, and its not provern but xbox 360 is rumored to have a cd/dvd burner, ps3=more games xbox 360=better everything else revoluton=not sure cuz the full specs havent been released yet, xbox xomes out next month and -s2 comes out next spring so they r bound to add more things, so im sure once it DOES come out itll be better than xbox

I can use my psp as a controller as well... But why would you want to? It has no R2 or L2, and no right analog stick. My guess is most games WONT support PSP use as a controller.. maybe as a remote controller for the menu or something but I dunno.

You can think what you want about the revolution, but the truth is that its the future of gaming. Next generation after this coming one, all consoles will use a controller that has a 3 dimensional range of movement. It just makes games so much easier.

Half of the 360s dont even have a hard drive... you have to pay extra. Its external memory since its removable. NOT internal. So basically it doesnt matter if its 20GB or a million GB because its REMOVABLE.

Same with PS3... on release, you could get a 20GB hard drive, a 60GB... 149GB.. whatever suits you. Your argument has no bearing, because as technology progresses we'll be seeing 500GB hard drives available for the ps3 and 360.

You dont know a lot about internet connections do you.. I might just steer clear of that for fear of boring people, but whether something is made by microsoft or not has absolutely nothing to do with how fast the connection is.

Where do you get your information from anyway? The PS3's graphics are better than Xbox360's... theres no argument about it. The PS3's specs are simply better... the reason why early games from ps3 and 360 might loko similar graphics wise, is because the PS3 is NEW TECHNOLOGY... no coder has experience in coding for 7 CPU cores, its hard as fuck. The xbox360 has 3... everyone knows how to code efficiently and use the hardwares full potential, because thats the same amount of cores they used LAST GENERATION.

and the 360 doesnt have "better everything else" ... They both have pretty much the same features. Except the maximum a dual layer DVD (360's game format) can hold is 4-9GB.

The PS3 uses blu-ray, (and its a cheap as fuck blu ray player too, considering blu ray disc players are like $3000 now) it can play blu-ray movies and games. A single layered blu ray disc holds 50GB ... which straight up owns DVD technology. But blu ray discs can have up to FOUR LAYERS. thats 200GB on a disc... more than most hard drives. Which just kills DVDs in every way. As well as the new coating they give to blu ray discs, that prevents scratches.

The facts are that the PS3 is better than the 360. Im not biased, I just base my shit off of facts. Whether the xbox will be more successful than the PS3, im not sure. It might because it comes out earlier and before christmas... microsoft are smart marketers.

I might not even get either of them, ill just wait to see how things play out. The one im definitely getting is the revolution... its lightyears ahead of xbox360 and ps3.

ok....didnt know xboxes memory was internal, personally i like the playstation better, and yes i do know alot about internet connections, far more that anyone on this site thank you very much, seeing as i make my own cat5 cable wjich i actually dont use anymore cuz i hooked up a wireless connection...lall in all i think ps3 is gonna have a bigger success than xbox 360, but if the rumors come true that ive heard about the 360 then its gonna surpass ps3 like whoa, as for the revolution, seeing as it comes out ages after the others, of course its gonna own but its only gonna have nintendo based games, and thats not alot