You don't know know what you're talking about because:

A) Apexx (who was the mod BEFORE Tito) didn't even update the Featured tracks feature for months.

B) Tito had a system in place for people to nominate tracks, but no one stepped up.

C) You DON'T drop tracks in the forum regularly


Calling me anything other than Q shows that you're reaching bruh, and have already lost this argument. I'm talking about kiwi. You're talking about plantain.


Case closed. Go to bed child.

*searches pages 20,21,22,23..AHH FUCK IT*

*yawns*


wow...I do believe Hades' composure has officially gone to hell.





:thefinger

You do know every one of those 'points' is irrelevant, right?

a.) I'm not talking about Apexx.
b.) Good for him. Now why doesn't he nominate tracks?
c.) WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING?

No, see, we're not talking apples and oranges; I'm talking logic and you're throwing around terms like ad hominem that have nothing to do with the topic. I haven't lost anything because I'm calling you names, one of the arguments is the fact that I have reasons behind calling you names.

But yeah, it seems I've won because you've resorted to the idiotic 'go to bed, child' statement, and, oh Lordie, it seems you haven't addressed a single one of my points where every one of my posts disprove everything you say.

And yet, this Thread is about Apexx, and how his thread in the Song's forum pertains to Tito's competency as a Mod.

Wow, talk about a confession validating my earlier point of, "YOU DON'T KNOW WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT."


You don't have any points to address. Tito has already answered you, and so have I. Like I said, you like to hear your self talk. That's apparent.

EDIT: Thanks for informing me the meaning of this thread. But now, it's going on a new topic. Make another thread if you want, I won't be bothered. Until then, actually read what I'm saying and talk or just shut the fuck up and admit you're an idiot.

definition of ad hominem:

an argument "against the man" or person. This is a device employed to attack not the issues but rather the one you are arguing with, especially on a personal level or basis. It is usually employed by those whose arguments are weak.

...I forgot which one of this you think this definition applies to.

And no, I'm not losing my composure, I think it's funny and sad how you sit there and never let anyone talk, and instead ignore them and make random statements by throwing around terms like ad hominem obviously just placed there to make you look like you know what you're talking about.

Funny...You had to look up Ad Hominem to realize I was right in my usage of it.


^^^^You just answered your own question right there.


*checks page 33.34.35.36*

FUCK!

...I had to look up ad hominem because you threw in that word knowing that I wouldn't know the meaning of it. No, you weren't right in your usage about it, because you're not even reading my posts and instead call me a child and choose to only address the topics that you have any answer you can pull off as logical.

- yawns. -

LOL..WTF

1st off, I don't know WTF you know, or DON'T KNOW for that matter.

2nd off, I don't give a SHIT what you know, or DON'T KNOW.

Kid, I think you need to just admit that you came in this thread on some "peanut gallery" bull shit not knowing WTF you were talking about. The issue was never whether the current system is any good. It was whether Tito was being fair with it.

Once again, we've established that Apexx is an idiot and that you love to bump ya gums about topics that don't concern you.

*checks pages 46,47,48,49*
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRG

You're funny, man...



I had to look up the definition because I don't know the phrase. You're acting like that's some big deal.



He brought it up. I'm not going to make another thread. Here, I'll break it down so it's really easy, okay?

1. Tito answers the thread.
2. I question the answer to the thread.

Easier still:

1. Tito explains.
2. I disagree with the explanation.

WOWZOR Q. ISN'T THAT JUST INSANE?!?!?!

What yall doing for the 4th of July?













1

Hopefully setting off some fireworks 'n shit.

lmao@how this whole argument just ended... this was on some real WB sitcom shyt....ctfu.... *whoo doggie!*