RapVerse.com Community

RapVerse.com Community (http://community.rapverse.com/index.php)
-   Lyricist Lounge (http://community.rapverse.com/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Iron Man on DVD today. (http://community.rapverse.com/showthread.php?t=247669)

King Solo 10-03-08 12:07 PM

Captain America would die with the birth of an average nerd.

Kirk 10-03-08 12:14 PM

Captain America is a douche, man. I dislike him about as much as I do Superman. But there was this cool series of Spiderman comics that I thought were dope. Tony Stark gave Peter Parker this armor. Shit looks dope.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/146/...171cea8.jpg?v=0

Kirk 10-03-08 12:15 PM

And I wish they'd make a game out of the Marvel Zombies series.

King Solo 10-03-08 12:22 PM

Superman is a REAL pimp.

Kirk 10-03-08 02:07 PM

A real fag*

King Solo 10-04-08 08:35 AM

Word.

You know what I find so fucking ridiculous about Superman. With the powers and abilities he possesses you can pretty much agree that he is by far one of THE MOST POWERFUL superheroes ever.

And yet all the others with lesser powers go around owning fags with raw superpowers.. whilst Superman is getting owned by Lex Luthor.

Blackmage 10-04-08 02:12 PM

Cap's stopped dr. doom with the beyonder's powers, he stopped baron blood and helped banish all vampires from the realm. He went toe to toe with batman for hours...

nobody's fucking with cap.

While spiderman was getting owned by tony stark cause when he put that suit on it was analyzing everything about him. so tony stark could kick the shit out of him later.

Kirk 10-04-08 02:49 PM

What I find funny is that in the comics, Superman has got his ass beat my Batman before. I really don't like the Hulk either. Dude is always killing other superheroes in the comics.

King Solo 10-05-08 06:23 PM

My all time favourite superhero always has and always will be Daredevil. I prefer not to acknowledge the ass portrayal by Ben Affleck. In my mind, there has never been a true Daredevil movie.

Kirk 10-05-08 06:58 PM

Man. That movie was so bad. What has Ben Affleck ever been in that was good?

King Solo 10-05-08 07:07 PM

Nothing.

But I hear at some point in the future he will appear in a coffin, that should be fucking monumental.

10-05-08 07:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk
Man. That movie was so bad. What has Ben Affleck ever been in that was good?


*smack*

dogma

Cola 10-05-08 08:09 PM

so, i watched Iron Man last night. It was actually a pretty good movie. I thought the plot was laid out nice....it flowed really smooth, kept you in base with the entire story of how he becomes Iron Man. N it was kinda of funny aswell.

i couldn't stop laughin when that machine kept trying to put fires out, n he's like...do that shit again and i'll donate you to a community college.


props to Downey, he really killed this movie.

King Solo 10-05-08 08:26 PM

^ You're right, Downey did indeed KILL this movie.

And not in a good way.

TeamOne 10-05-08 09:39 PM

^^ wat are u on? i think you're really in the minority thinking that A. Iron Man was bad and that B. RDJ gave a poor performance

he made the movie

Cola 10-05-08 10:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy Bob
^ You're right, Downey did indeed KILL this movie.

And not in a good way.



no shit, go watch a japense cartoon ya fag.


you obviously dont understand what good acting is.

Kirk 10-06-08 06:53 AM

Yeah, man. It was definetly a great flick.

King Solo 10-06-08 09:30 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamOne
^^ wat are u on? i think you're really in the minority thinking that A. Iron Man was bad and that B. RDJ gave a poor performance

he made the movie




I don't question that, I am in the minority.

The fact is, in my opinion his performance was overall below average and the movie sucked. That is just me though. :thumbup:

TeamOne 10-06-08 10:23 AM

you're either a DC comics fan or just not a comic book movie fan

King Solo 10-06-08 11:01 AM

I hate DC. They have fucking ridiculous superheroes and villains.

Although, Martian Manhunter is pretty beast.

But, I am a huge Marvel fan.. I just am NOT a fan of comic book movies because I am yet to see one that lives up to the character/s it is about.

King Solo 10-06-08 11:05 AM

Also, I might be biased on Iron Man because I am not really a fan of Iron Man in general.


It's like I have 4 favourite Marvel characters.. and so far 3 of them have been portrayed by fucking stupid shitty casting choices.


Daredevil - Ben Affleck (WTF!!)
Juggernaut - Vinnie Jones (gay, because his wisecracks in X3 ruined the character)
Venom - Topher Grace (yay! Eric fucking Foreman playing Venom.. GAY!)

now Gambit is the only one left.

Taylor Kitsch plays him in the upcoming Wolverine Origins movie.. I like Taylor Kitsch.. he sucked in The Covenant.. but he owns as Tim Riggins in FNL.

Now I just have to wait and see if he bombs or not..

Kirk 10-06-08 07:38 PM

Wolverine is a badass.

Cola 10-06-08 07:53 PM

fuck that

batman destroys everything.

i'd say

Batman Begins
Orginal Batman *can't beat a classic*
Newest Batman
Iron Man

in that order....dopest movies for super hero's

10-06-08 08:05 PM

Lol What Abt Hancock

Cola 10-06-08 08:12 PM

shrt wrdng tigs iz awzum

King Solo 10-07-08 05:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinky
fuck that

batman destroys everything.

i'd say

Batman Begins
Orginal Batman *can't beat a classic*
Newest Batman
Iron Man

in that order....dopest movies for super hero's



word to the dark knight.. but seriously.. it shits over all 3 other movies you mentioned combined.

Cola 10-08-08 01:17 AM

not really

due to the fact that the orignal batman...is a classic. Hands down.

You have to take into account that acting, when it was made, and who was in it...and HOW they played those roles. Dont just base a movie on what kinda of graphics they provide.

N the only reason i love Batman Begins is due to the fact that it was GREAT story. Hands down, a GREAT story.....they explained everything in a way that wasn't boring...but got all the points across and gave a great movie/action scences through out.

agree?

King Solo 10-08-08 07:59 AM

It's not about graphics or whatever.

I think the Dark Knight owns simply for the portrayals of each character. Two Face was way better in the Dark Knight than in Batman Forever with fucking Tommy Lee Jones playing him. Heath Ledger did a far better portrayal of the Joker than Jack Nicholson. Jack Nicholson had that laugh working, but Heath just portrayed him to be the dark, sadistic psychopath he truly is.

And Christian Bale is by far the best Batman. George Clooney sucked. Val Kilmer sucked. And Michael Keaton sucked major.

Blackmage 10-08-08 09:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy Bob
It's not about graphics or whatever.

I think the Dark Knight owns simply for the portrayals of each character. Two Face was way better in the Dark Knight than in Batman Forever with fucking Tommy Lee Jones playing him. Heath Ledger did a far better portrayal of the Joker than Jack Nicholson. Jack Nicholson had that laugh working, but Heath just portrayed him to be the dark, sadistic psychopath he truly is.

And Christian Bale is by far the best Batman. George Clooney sucked. Val Kilmer sucked. And Michael Keaton sucked major.


The joker's super sanity makes giving him a personality problematic. He as "super sanity" therefore he doesn't have one personality set. He's different from day to day. Therefore jack nicholson's portrayl of him was absolutely correct seeing as the joker has been interpreted that way by some of marvel's best writers.

Kirk 10-08-08 10:03 AM

You can't even compare their portrayals of the character. They were both going for completely different things. Both of them achieved the exact kind of character that they wanted the Joker to be. Both were great performances, but I prefer Ledgers.

King Solo 10-08-08 11:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackmage
The joker's super sanity makes giving him a personality problematic. He as "super sanity" therefore he doesn't have one personality set. He's different from day to day. Therefore jack nicholson's portrayl of him was absolutely correct seeing as the joker has been interpreted that way by some of marvel's best writers.




Who cares how Marvel's best writer's interpreted the Joker's character because last time I checked he was property of DC Comics, not Marvel.

Cola 10-08-08 12:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk
You can't even compare their portrayals of the character. They were both going for completely different things. Both of them achieved the exact kind of character that they wanted the Joker to be. Both were great performances, but I prefer Ledgers.



i agree with you almost 100%, but come on....you can't say that we'd even be going 'ledger fuckin rocked' if Nicloson hadn't fuckin done such a great job.

and two face? what? how can you even compare those two characters 'jones' and 'eckhart'??? They played completely different roles.

N i never stated that any of the other batman's were good...EVER.

Just Batman 1, Batman Returns (was ok...def, not my favorite), Batman Begins, Dark Knight

King Solo 10-08-08 12:20 PM

Every Batman movie was ass up until Christian Bale stepped into the role.


And you are completely retarded.

My whole point is that Eckhart portrayed Two Face differently, and his different portrayal in comparison to Tommy Lee Jones portrayal was better. The fact that he took a different approach to the role made it better.

I swear, sometimes its like I am talking to fucking children.

Cola 10-08-08 12:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy Bob
Every Batman movie was ass up until Christian Bale stepped into the role.

And you are completely retarded.

My whole point is that Eckhart portrayed Two Face differently, and his different portrayal in comparison to Tommy Lee Jones portrayal was better. The fact that he took a different approach to the role made it better.

I swear, sometimes its like I am talking to fucking children.


1. Again, you dont know what acting is.....i never said that Ketan should have one a fuckin Oscar for the movie's he was in, but dude...those movies are fuckin classic's. So shut the fuck up.

2. Its funny that you sit and call people names, than say that we're acting like children. rofl. :screwy:

Cola 10-08-08 12:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy Bob
Every Batman movie was ass up until Christian Bale stepped into the role.


And you are completely retarded.

My whole point is that Eckhart portrayed Two Face differently, and his different portrayal in comparison to Tommy Lee Jones portrayal was better. The fact that he took a different approach to the role made it better.

I swear, sometimes its like I am talking to fucking children.



No shit, you dumb fuck...he obvisly HAD to take a different approach, becuase the story was fucking different. Tommy Lee Jones played a way better villian compared to Echart...PERIOD. Echart was just slurring his words n yelling with some computer graphics on his face.

If anything, the villians in Batman with Jim Carrey in it wasn't that the villians sucked, it was the fucking Batman that sucked. The Riddler was a cool ass character, just they went with a less dark attitude about it. Which was what most movies were doing at the time, so before you fuckin start rippin the fuck out of shit, becuase you think your opinion matters, which it doesn't. Get a valid grasp of the topic your talkin about.

The whole 'dark' batman look...came after what movie?? BATMAN BEGINS. HOOOLLLYYY FUCK.

N were did i say that movie ranked, at the top. it changed the views of how the batman movies should be viewed.

Here Nick, take my balls....n love them.

King Solo 10-08-08 01:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinky
No shit, you dumb fuck...he obvisly HAD to take a different approach, becuase the story was fucking different. Tommy Lee Jones played a way better villian compared to Echart...PERIOD. Echart was just slurring his words n yelling with some computer graphics on his face.

If anything, the villians in Batman with Jim Carrey in it wasn't that the villians sucked, it was the fucking Batman that sucked. The Riddler was a cool ass character, just they went with a less dark attitude about it. Which was what most movies were doing at the time, so before you fuckin start rippin the fuck out of shit, becuase you think your opinion matters, which it doesn't. Get a valid grasp of the topic your talkin about.

The whole 'dark' batman look...came after what movie?? BATMAN BEGINS. HOOOLLLYYY FUCK.

N were did i say that movie ranked, at the top. it changed the views of how the batman movies should be viewed.

Here Nick, take my balls....n love them.




OMFG! You liked the Riddler.. that officially confirms you truly are a homosexual. The last comment you posted was just like bonus evidence.

Cola 10-08-08 02:01 PM

saying 'like' before saying anything, proves your pure dick enjoyment.


Riddler was dope. period.

Kirk 10-08-08 02:48 PM

Here is the order of how good the Batman films were.

1) The Dark Knight
2) The Dark Knight
3) The Dark Knight
4) The Dark Knight
5) Batman Begins
6) Batman Begins
7) Batman
8) Batman Returns

I chose to not include Batman Forever and Batman and Robin, because they were some of the most terrible superhero films of all time. I agree that Batman (1989) was a good film for its time, and that Batman Returns was a good film for it's time. But with other Batman films like Begins and the Dark Knight out, they don't seem as good as they used to. Although the score for Batman (1989) is fuckin' sick. And I also chose not to include the Adam West Batman, for obvious reasons.

Kirk 10-08-08 02:49 PM

P.S. - The Riddler (Jim Carrey) was fucking terrible, dude. As was Two-Face (Tommy Lee).

Blackmage 10-08-08 03:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy Bob
Who cares how Marvel's best writer's interpreted the Joker's character because last time I checked he was property of DC Comics, not Marvel.


Writers cross over from time to time. They don't always write for one universe. Plenty of marvel cross to dc to darkhorse to image all the time.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.