Battle just because I asked about you? Um, you wanted someone to ask about you.

Losing doesn't necessarily mean the other person was dickrode, especially when the person is more likely to get hate votes instead of d/r votes.

haha, go vote people, wtf @ no activity in the top 16 forum for like a whole day? There's battles to be voted on! :)

Word, Mim needs to instate a rule for the Top 16 also, wherein battlers have to drop by Wednesday.

Ye but RV takes dickriding to a whole new level
Wasnt particuarly the dickriding comment at you to be honest
Just in general ive noticed

^^ - Word, hate to say it, but I definately seen a lot of d/r on this site. RB has it too, all sites do, but I feel a lot of people who vote don't understand wordplay on this site and in fear of looking stupid just vote for the more experienced person and not the better bar. Given that it doesn't take more than a few mins to vote on a bar, honestly I think this league should create a voting council of like the 11 most honest and skilled minds and only they would be allowed to vote on battles, or at least, of the top 16 ones.

^ That'd never work. There is not one person here who isn't disliked by somebody, and so if you vote against somebody who doesn't like you.. it's just like, they'd think they were getting dicked out of a win.

I can't really do that, unless you can find a list of 11 people who everybody likes and is cool with voting on all of the top 16 battles.

Not feeling this rule at all.Your forcing people to vote on battles..and let's say..someone doesn't understand a punch...Their gonna have to vote no matter what...And a lot of people think that explaining a punch weakens it....so it'll fuck things up..

What the fuck do you expect me to do then?

First, people say nobody votes on Top 16 battles. I say vote on Top 16 battles and people say but then people won't understand.

So, how about this, you guys tell me what to do.

A voting council won't work (refer to above post).

My opinion,is to leave things the way they are..
.
.
.

..
.
.

.
But I'm guessing others will different from me though.

Whatever.. let's just see how it works this week. If shit turns gay, I'll change it back.

Nah it should be cool. Just change the wording of the rule. Everyone should ATTEMPT to vote on all of the top 16 battles. Basically if you don't get a punch then just PM the writer for an explanation or post in the thread that you can't decide or don't get it or whatever to show that you've attempted to follow the rule. In most cases it should be fine

Yeah, sounds good. I'll edit it.

Nah I disagree n' here's why. It's embarassing to pm someone and ask what their punch means cuz it makes you seem dumb. So therefore, people will vote and act like they get it when they do. I mean, I know I don't want newbie dumb shits voting on my battles. My only loss this season was a result of just dumb voting. I think this voting council would work.. what about something like, n' this is just a rough idea

Trus, Fux, Hotshh, 9th, Vaskez, Red Bull, Daubs, JTR, Apostrophe, Drakel, E.C.

What do you all think about something like that or a modification of that list?

lol your only loss is to me, muhahahaha :D

the problem with the voting council is...can you really be bothered to vote on all the wack newb battles? Or are you saying the voting council is only for the top 16? In which case it'd be alright

also I have no problem PM-ing for an explanation - cos usually if I don't get it it's badly worde, forced or is based on a foreign concept that I don't get cos I don't live there