RapVerse.com Community - America is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, not a Democracy

RapVerse.com Community (http://community.rapverse.com/index.php)

- Lyricist Lounge (http://community.rapverse.com/forumdisplay.php?f=182)

- - America is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, not a Democracy (http://community.rapverse.com/showthread.php?t=246784)

lol @ saying that the 'Great Whore' would be the Christian relgion itself.

So by that logic.....

God creates the church....then the church is the one who puts the revlations into motion by being 'the great whore'

lol...hahahahahah.....amazing

Quote:

Originally Posted by -White Powder-

I'm going to make this short itself as I'm working on a paper but think of the NAU this way

The United States will be one part as a whole, all 50 states combined will make up 1 / 3rd of the union. these states dont become separate entities. Its not like the EU separated their countries states (although there isnt a good example for sake of argument) but they allowed each country to join as a separate entity to the Union. For example when Sweden joined the union they did not lose the title of Sweden or any "states" if they had any.. What i'm getting at is primarily this quote
"The European Union is composed of 27 independent sovereign countries"
The NAU would not remove the states from America, it would keep them intact, much like the provinces in canada would be intact. There is little separation of the countries intact.

The "American way" will still thrive in the United States.

"For example, if Muslims ruled where Westerners lived and that was our main ideology basis for our laws, we would be marrying 6 year old girls who call themselves Muslim."
I take this quote from your statement and it is true, if that were actually the way the EU system was run than you would be correct in the outcome, though the system in which the union is run through a supreme council etc prevents one person / belief to run the Union. Much like the house of commons in canada where all political parties have the ability to earn seats and have their voices heard in parliament.

The religious stuff I will not get into as I do not really follow nor participate in much of it at all.

Overall the NAU (if it would ever occur) and yes I am doubting the occurance due to the gain and loss of each nation. overall the NAU would not separate the united "states" it would combine what the United States brought to the Union as one entity, or 1/3rd of the Union. Canada's provinces would be 1/3rd of the union and Mexico would be 1/3rd of the union. Although proper weighting towards the council / supreme powers of this union would have to be taken into account as mexico probably would not get as much representation compared to Canada or the United States.
Thats just how I see the union.

Two questions

Do you think one world government is a grand idea? That's the reason that the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) wants to connect these countries.. They connected the Europeans, They want North and South America connected, Asia, and the Middle East.

4 World Entities, later to come together into 1 world entity.

That's question one.

Question two,

How are you going to honestly say that our states will be preserved with no proof? You know damn well you aren't creating the situation, lol. All of our states could easily break up and we'd become a new country. It's too early to say, but logic dictates that we would NOT keep our states. Do you know any way we possibly could if we broke borders? I sure don't.

The European Union did not create a new country out of it. I am basing my statements off of what has already occured through the EU and then translating them over to what an NAU would entail.

Canada would be one country including provinces and territories. The United States would be one country including all 50 states. Mexico would be another country. Its simple logic if you look at the EU and compare, did any country that join lose their "country" did any country that joined lose their major cities / provinces? No. They are independent sovereign countries. However in the EU these countries come together as states. So if we use the same logic, the NAU would have 3 states, USA, Canada, & Mexico. That is what I am basing my statements off of, as it seems logical. Why would the US enter a NAU and give up their 50 states, why would Canada enter the NAU and give up their provinces and territories.... it seems like a ridiculous idea in my mind if the NAU was constructed that way and it would not work, nor would anyone agree to it, especially the united states.

back to your first question as I dealt with them in opposite order,

I do not believe one world government is even possible. Not to venture off into a religious debate, but look at the religious wars and conflicts that have been taking place for decades, look at the conflicts between the US and Iraq / Iran etc. A utopian society where everything is run by one government is just not possible. I could not see it ever happening in my lifetime. First of all you'd have to get every country to agree to join said unions and then every union must agree to merge and recreate laws an everything. It just wouldnt be possible to do so. Creating one general law consensus would not be able to be enforced, as the western world is quite different from the eastern world / middle eastern world. I dont see it happening, nor do I think it would be a good thing.

As I previously stated, in the case of the NAU treaties bills and acts would better suit the countries involved as there is too much to lose and not enough to gain.

The NAU in conjunction with the UN.

These two are a team.

Could it not be said the "People's government" of America, is now a Shadow government, trading the liberties of the people for its own 'Security' ?

Edit:
Let me share something with ya, White.

Lmao. I love political comics.

again.....2v is a drug addict

I KNEW you were a regular info wars visitor. I could just tell by the way you talked. It's finally confirmed.