Quote:
what punch!!!!!!!!!:( |
tizzle get on aim son.............
|
lol yeah i didnt see nuttin....
|
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG BAAAALZ holla at cha boy..........
|
i am on AIM son...
. . . .. . . . . . . BLAH!! 500TH POST BITCHES!!!!!!!!!! |
Quote:
TRASSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! weerdness |
Yeeeeeeeeppppp......ummm......206!!!
Soemone Battle Me!!! |
you mean 204:).
|
punchlines? i ripped his ass into to parts.... cheek to cheek... now u got fou...jk two oh fo.....
|
Definate Fully
Definate Full Check Ya Pms And Check The Crew Forum Iight Homie???
|
yo can i get a sig hit me up /Peace
|
1. Cutting:
......For$aken- overall bad cuttin. can see where the pic got cut (black lines, etc...), and u can see parts of his hands. Definate Fully- not that great cuttin. i can see where he wuz cut, but i feel you did better than For$aken 2. Backround: ......For$aken- good graffiti backround, kinda fades off at the end. But i liked the wall effect. I feel yours wuz better than definate fully's. Definate Fully- kind of plain, black and white. should get rid of boxes, would look a lot neater and not nearly as choppy. I see the graffiti in the bak, but it is kinda obscured by the boxes. 3. Font: ......For$aken- decent font. The letters might be mistaken for something else though. It overlaps the picture, which I don't like. It is kind of transparent, which I like. Subtext wuz kind of wavy (which doesnt look that good) and blurry. Overall i think yours wuz better than Definate Fully's. Definate Fully- Ok graffiti font, not the best that would go with the sig. Subtext is too big, but it does go with the sig enough. 4. Blending: ......For$aken- The pic isn't blended well, but the font is good. You were better in blending. Definate Fully- Bad blending, need to work on that. 5. Quality: ......For$aken- Pic is not the best, but overall its ok. Definate Fully- Ok quality. I think you had better quality overall. 6. Originality: ......For$aken- not much originality, graffiti is original though. You were more original I feel than Definate Fully was. Definate Fully- same as for$aken, except the graffiti isnt as original as for$aken. 7. Colors: ......For$aken- A lot of colors, the go well, but there are too many for me to like. They don't go as well as Definate Fully's. Definate Fully- Even though they are black and white, they went together and are easier on the eye than For$aken's. Try to put more color in sigs though, B & W gets boring after a while, like 3 seconds. 8. Level of Difficulty: ......For$aken- Overall i would rate your difficulty rating as a 7/10. The graffiti wall was probably the hardest part. Definate Fully- I think your difficulty rating would be a 6/10. The boxes and the graffiti were most likely the hardest part. 9. Typography: ......For$aken- The font letters could be mistaken for others, which is why you do not get this category. Definate Fully- Easy to read, and nothing can be confused, this is why you got this category. 10. Overall: ......For$aken- Hmm overall I would rate this sig a 6.6/10. This is definately not your best work, but not your worst. Definate Fully- Overall your sig is a 6/10 to me. It is too basic, and the boxes make it look choppy. ......For$aken: 6 Categories Definate Fully: 4 Categories vote- For$aken px |
SOUTHSIDE!!!!!!!!!!.....PSYCH NORTHSIDE HOEE!!!!!!!!!!!!215!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!! i'm 2 lazy 2 vote but i'll jus say i liked both but for$aken u keep usin those krazii white people in ur sigz no racism :thumbup:
|
uppin for my road buddy GGGGGGGGGGballz!!!!!!!!!!!.:)
|
damn y did i post such a long vote? lol god i coulda just said For$aken and been done. damn.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM. |