![]() |
Quote:
im awake dawg u living in a hypothetical world im living in reality |
Quote:
^^sounds nice to say but has no content. Watch: "How am I living in a hypothetical world?" vs. "How you are trying to discourage a discussion about your future" I'm looking at reality, you're hiding your head in the sand. |
no im not
i happen to not be thinking worst-case scenario to the max nothings going to happen with this situation end of story |
Quote:
"the max"? I thought that was called "thinking things to the logical conclusion". nothing's gonna happen? <---that's your hypothetical exiastance. "Nothing's gonna happen" is what people said about 9/11, the tsunami, AIDS, katrina, and a whoooollee lot more. I consider these as 'possible realities' and even 'likely realitite'. You don't even consider them possible, though the course is heading right toward it. That's a huge difference. specially when you havent stated a single thing to show why you think that everything's gonna be a-ok. |
i dont need to the future will be my evidence dawg
get real |
Quote:
Reality: "Yo Zig, it looks a fire is about to spread to your house!!" Zig-Zag: "eh, why think about it. we'll see when it happens" Eh, to each his own. Just don't get in my way. |
god those are two completely different situations lol
|
^^I guess (as usual) you don't realize "Reality" is talking to YOU.
but like I said man, feel how ever you want to feel. just don't get in my way. |
Apexx you seem to know a lot...i once heard a rumor of the U.S. having lazers that can shoot satelites down in space...and maybe even shooting nukes..any way this is true???
|
Quote:
I know about this. But, you asked Apexx. :thumbup: |
Quote:
I dunno about satelites in space, but I DO know that there's a laser weapon that shoots down missiles of all types already out. Coincidentally, just released, it's already called "the fastest weapon in the world" since its a laser rather than a round. It works by heating up the warhead of the missile till it detonates. can't exactly shoot nukes out of the air though lol. the radioactive material it releases would still wreak havoc which is half the reason nukes are used instead of H-bombs. Besides, nukes are detonated in the air anyway, they never hit the ground. ICBM's would deal with nukes that are still in space before they come back down but that's assuming the nuke is launched as a missile, not from a sub or bomber. |
Damn Apexx Is A Smart Motherfucker
|
Wonder what it would've been like if Kerry won the election...bout 4 years ago.
|
Well, even if war does happen, Bush will only be in office another 2 years, so who knows. Maybe the next President can fix this.
Also, everyone should try to go to college, because we don't have enough people to fight a war and win, Iraq is showing that right now. That is why we are making such strides in robotic warfare, it's because the government knows that people don't want to fight. We only have 250,000 people in the armed forces I think they said? China has millions I think, not quite sure though. If you know apexx please say so. But ya, you may want to consider college now in order to avoid a draft. |
Quote:
but one of our bombs will take them out in a instance the have a billion people but they have so many people per square inch. so one of our weapons will take out more chinese while one of theres will not take out as many of ours |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM. |