lol they killed Xavier. this tourney been so wack. Liek no classic games really, except for the 2nd day of first rd. =/

like the tourney where Siena made it to final 4 was the great one. SOOOOOOO many upsets, and so many great games that yr. Except the final 4, and title game blew. but everything else was ill

your just salty that Stanford couldn't "upset" Texas <3

^LOL nah son. all the games blow-outs tho. Even last night yo.

Name me some classic match-ups so far. lol past the first Rd. only one that comes to mind is Stanford- Marquette.

like the yr, FLorida won first one, was best NCAA tournament I think. The amount of drama and shit in those games was ill. It was exactly like last yr's college football season. So many upsets, and classic games lol

umm, i wouldn't say i've seen a ton of "classic" games, but really-really good games...yes i would say i've seen them. Duke-West Virgina, all of the Davidson game's, UCLA's last game.....there has been alot of competive, close-good games. Ya dig?

ehhh a all #1 final 4 is not interesting at all son. I wanna see some UPSETS ya dig?

an upset doesn't define a good game

^well if you look at the examples I stated it does. Last years college football season, almost all of them were amazing. (Mich-Appalachian St.; Stanford- USC; LSU-Kentucky; LSU- Arkansas, etc etc) then look @ the year florida won it's first title in B-ball. The Siena matches were all classics, that Gonzaga game where Morrison broke down crying, and countless classics.

this tournament rarely had any. More 15+ pt victories then close ones

App-Michigan was just a huge upset, one team played horrible while another team played extremely well. Just so happens that one team HAD TO play horrible in order for it to be a really GOOD game. An upset is just having one great team playing horrible, and one semi-good team playing really good on any certain day. I'd way much rather rather see Ali-Frazier fight...and have Ali win every time, becuse you KNOW that its a GOOD fight, not a upset...but its a GOOD fight. We just dont see eye to on eye on this topic

Are you serious? you must of not watched that game then.

If you saw last quarter, both teams were playing great on offense and making great plays. Michigan's RB, I forget his name played ill.

and your definition is wrong, that can be the case sometimes, but not all the time. And those games I stated weren't wack.

how you gonna deny LSU-Kentucky and LSU-Arkansas weren't ill?

triple OT's for both games. End of story

so your saying that every tripple over time game EVER played was because it was a "great" game, highly unlikely.....and like i orignally stated, those games were really good games, but "great"---no.

^son wtf? Did I say EVERY? I said that those games were played well by both teams for THREE OTs.

and what about Oklahoma- Boise St.? How was that game not great? David v.s Goliath shit.

fact is, this NCAA tournament didn't have too many exciting games. MAJORITY of the games were one team COMPLETELY outplaying the other team. And all I said, is that does not make for interesting games. Davidson-Kansas, now that was one of those games that the tourney could of used more off. But most of them were similiar to the Texas-Memphis game.

I don't see why you're even trying to argue, look @ any sports article by ESPN, CBS, Fox, or whoever when discussing the NCAA tournament when George mason made the final 4 (Was GM not siena, which i initially thought). It was hailed as one of the most exciting if not THE most exiting tournaments ever. So yea, you can argue upsets don't always make great games, but those upsets in that tournament did.

This tournament has been mostly boring, and most games are pretty much decided after the first half this year. So all I said was, this tournament pales in comparison to that particular tournament. Which if you compare the games, it is pretty much an accurate account

i love you...nuff said

Boise St.-Oklahama WAS the greatest football game ever played

GO UNC............. chea.

WORD Eclipse 4 lyfe sonnnn

lol, WORD SON! WORD!