RapVerse.com Community

RapVerse.com Community (http://community.rapverse.com/index.php)
-   Lyricist Lounge (http://community.rapverse.com/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Who's picture is this? (http://community.rapverse.com/showthread.php?t=224367)

mind_immortal 03-15-06 06:53 PM

yeah the annunaki ... aka. angels oriphim, nephilim, seraphim, were different sects... or heirarchies of angels... we as stupid conditioned humans...also hybrids of the annunaki and some form oh existing hominid...called called them angels in our ignorance ... if you would like to learn more about this ... go to www.crystalinks.com
you can also google sumerian clay tablets, annunaki, elohim, the epic of gilgamesh, the descent of innana, planet x, niburu, the 12th planet...and zecharia sitchen...in crystal links look up annunaki, ancient flying vessels(vimanas) the emerald tablets of thoth(pronounced toth)... all of this information is debatable... but i will say this take it as a grain of salt and also the truth is most definately stranger than fiction...!!!

La Cosa Nostra 03-15-06 09:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apexx
No doubt about it, but in order for a new one to be born, the old universe must first die. If it dies, that means it is capable of dying - which according to the Bible is not something God is capable of. Not to mention that the bible states that after God made himself, he came to make the "heavens and the earth". "Heaven" is above earth. What's above earth is space. The inky blackness of carbon ether. If he made it as he made the planet earth, then he could not possibly be the universe, for it is a creation that he created AFTER he already came into existence.

But does one really die if all thats happening is a large compression followed by a re-birth as a new cycle is created?

And as the big bang happens, the matter that now makes up the earth would have been forming along with all other planets in the universe right after the heavens (which would be referring to the starry sky dome that they saw from the earth back then) had just come into existance as the earth would have just started attaching itself into orbit with the sun.

However remember also that the bible, although a great read.. Is not always going to be scientifically correct.. It's explenation of how the world came to be is pretty realistic as to what may have happened.. But theres no real way someone from 2000+ years ago back when science was literally non-existant could give an accurate theory of what went down back when there were no earthly inhabitants to view such happenings. And even these days we can only give off plausable theorys. For all we know, our galaxy was singularily formed through matter leading through a black hole from another parralelle universe creating a big bang effect then slowly reaching a point of demise where the effect is turned back on itself sucking everything slowly back in and beginning a new cycle in another universe or universal location. For all we know, the big bang theory is way more localised than our innitial theorys. Possibly the universe is a constant?

The reason I believe god is the universe is simple deductive logic. It makes more sense realistically than a sepetate entity being that god is supposidly everywhere in the universe at the same time.. He takes no depictable form, he is in complete control of everything and everything abides by his laws.

We were supposidly made in his image.. Look at the human brain. It is essentually millions of tiny receptors all connected to make a larger whole. The universe is an inconcievable amount of tiny stars and planets all connected, moving together through the force of gravity.

There is so much about this universe that we literally have absolutly no idea about. Our science of today is primative compared to what it will become in the distant future. I mean I could be wrong? God could be some kind of universal energy force? Or he could be a seperate entity.. I'm just going by whats most logical and realistic in concurrance to the currant human knowledge on these matters.

Abraxas 03-15-06 10:12 PM

Fucking Europeans....
Jesus is white.
God is black.

Abraxas 03-15-06 10:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mind_immortal
yeah the annunaki ... aka. angels oriphim, nephilim, seraphim, were different sects... or heirarchies of angels... we as stupid conditioned humans...also hybrids of the annunaki and some form oh existing hominid...called called them angels in our ignorance ... if you would like to learn more about this ... go to www.crystalinks.com
you can also google sumerian clay tablets, annunaki, elohim, the epic of gilgamesh, the descent of innana, planet x, niburu, the 12th planet...and zecharia sitchen...in crystal links look up annunaki, ancient flying vessels(vimanas) the emerald tablets of thoth(pronounced toth)... all of this information is debatable... but i will say this take it as a grain of salt and also the truth is most definately stranger than fiction...!!!


I'm at a big fucking lost right now...

P.S.
Who the fuck believes in a psyhic.
She's just some researcher terapist bitch.

Crazy Hades 03-15-06 10:18 PM

Yeah...seriously...what the fuck? Pyramids in the grid? A dude from Atlantis came to earth in a UFO?

Abraxas 03-15-06 10:24 PM

Apparently I disagree with half of the things that the bible says.
Don't been confused I believe in God and Jesus.
But the bible is pure shit.

CRiSS-CROSS 03-15-06 10:28 PM

It's a picture of jesus?

∆ P E X X 03-16-06 01:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nostradamus
But does one really die if all thats happening is a large compression followed by a re-birth as a new cycle is created?

And as the big bang happens, the matter that now makes up the earth would have been forming along with all other planets in the universe right after the heavens (which would be referring to the starry sky dome that they saw from the earth back then) had just come into existance as the earth would have just started attaching itself into orbit with the sun.

However remember also that the bible, although a great read.. Is not always going to be scientifically correct.. It's explenation of how the world came to be is pretty realistic as to what may have happened.. But theres no real way someone from 2000+ years ago back when science was literally non-existant could give an accurate theory of what went down back when there were no earthly inhabitants to view such happenings. And even these days we can only give off plausable theorys. For all we know, our galaxy was singularily formed through matter leading through a black hole from another parralelle universe creating a big bang effect then slowly reaching a point of demise where the effect is turned back on itself sucking everything slowly back in and beginning a new cycle in another universe or universal location. For all we know, the big bang theory is way more localised than our innitial theorys. Possibly the universe is a constant?

The reason I believe god is the universe is simple deductive logic. It makes more sense realistically than a sepetate entity being that god is supposidly everywhere in the universe at the same time.. He takes no depictable form, he is in complete control of everything and everything abides by his laws.

We were supposidly made in his image.. Look at the human brain. It is essentually millions of tiny receptors all connected to make a larger whole. The universe is an inconcievable amount of tiny stars and planets all connected, moving together through the force of gravity.

There is so much about this universe that we literally have absolutly no idea about. Our science of today is primative compared to what it will become in the distant future. I mean I could be wrong? God could be some kind of universal energy force? Or he could be a seperate entity.. I'm just going by whats most logical and realistic in concurrance to the currant human knowledge on these matters.


If something can reanimate it self and return to life it still but still decays, ages and dies, then by definition it can not be "God". Therefore the universe can not be "God".

Lay-z 03-16-06 01:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Q.
Charles Manson






But, I know what you're getting at. Imma find the picture "POPULAR SCIENCE" magazine generated to depict what Jesus would have looked like.

Based on the time and region in which he lived, Jesus would have:

#1...been Short...probably under 5'9"...So, he would have been unassuming at best.

#2...Medium to brown skin...He was arab...And, that region was in the middle of the desert. So, even if Jesus was initially fair skinned, he wouldn't have been by the time of his death. In other words, Jesus was not lilly white because he wasn't European.

#3...Had a beard...it was customary for Hebrew men to have beards...He would have had a beard


#4...a short hair cut...It was NOT JEWISH custom for men to have long flowing hair. So, this European depiction of Jesus is bogus.


#5...been Built...Jesus would not have been a skinny guy. He was a carpenter and would have had muscles. So, this frail thin depiction of Jesus is bogus.


#6...been relatively unattractive...He was a common man, living a commoners life...His face would have been weathered from being out in the elements so much. He would also have brown eyes and brown hair.



IN other words, you would not be able to tell that Jesus was "JESUS" by looking at him. That's the reason Judas had to point him out when the Roman Centurions came to arrest him. He didn't stand out from the crowd at all, exactly the way he wanted it.


Q you are a G.............

Zone Out 03-17-06 10:36 PM

Imma have to say Jesus was arabic


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.