Originally Posted by cu cullian

wed i read about all that aehile agoo about how aids or hiv doesnt kill you it weakens you and other virus's n diseases are the ones thata ctually kill you and aswell there is a book out called sumthin along the lines of like good newz u do not get aids from unprotected sex but the bad newz is you do get it from recreational drugz i havent read it but ive heard alot about it and that alot of the book makes sense n tells how wat we hav been thought about aids is lies

Originally Posted by Tha Q.

1 Aiight...I agree about the vaccines...We all got them as children...So, you're suggesting that vaccines for other diseases can predicate humans being susceptible to contracting AIDS?


2So, if that's the truth, where does AIDS exist in your opinion?

Also, I was saying that it's possible--theoretically--that AIDS can exist in nature and simply be dormant, i.e. host animals. Ebola is certainly that way and only rears it's ugly head in spurts.

Originally Posted by Apexx

1: Yes. That's what I was saying. Not just vaccines, but anything that puts a stress on the immune system, like drug use, lack of sleep, lack of iron and nutrients, fast food consumption, pork consumption, lack of certain sugars in the body, lack of excercise, etc. Any thing that will cause a strain on your body creates a strain on the immune system. Ever seen a person get sick with the Flu by doing nothing more than overworking them self and skipping sleep? How about people who seem to have a cold after a night of excessive drinking? Same thing. Run across this virus in that time and you'll suffer from it.

2: I have no opinion. I know that AIDS exists within our bodies waiting for the day it's unlocked. Even when you contract AIDS, it's shown that AIDS has an internal life of 30 days or less. Don't strain your system and you won't get AIDS. why? Because you can't get AIDS in a perfectly healthy body. Simple as that. Google for the key words that I mentioned earlier and we can skip this part of the discussion.

Originally Posted by Mimesis

Yeah, I'm too lazy to go quote your post and shit..

But, I wasn't even going to post again because I'm not the type of person that needs to get the last word, but since you seem to be expecting a post from me.. it's all good.

For me it's just like.. I know I can get links, book references, etc. to back up 1. AIDs is not man made and 2. Viruses are living. Both on going debates, but there are scientists arguing both for and against both of them. You and me are on the opposite sides of the todom pole. Great. I don't really have anything else to say, though. I'm not going to leave a random post just to post. I'm not a fucking dumbass, and I wasn't about to come back in here and be like, "NAHH SUN, U'Z DA WRONG WUN!!" because I've already posted everything I've wanted to write.

So, whatever. I still don't think AIDs is man made.

Originally Posted by cu cullian

wat u mean wen u say even if u contract aids but right before it u said every1 has aids within their bodies

and aswell so if u have a perfectly healthy body u say u wont get aids?? so if u hav unprotected sex wit sum1 that has aids n u yourself hav perfectly healthy body u wont get it?????

oh and i did google the word n learned alot still readin it but none of wat i saw put it simple to just explainn wat it is its all articles and essays on it so i still aint got around to wat your sayin im gettin most it but sum parts are still abit dark

Originally Posted by cu cullian

during 1969
to 1971 to Africa and some countries such as India, Nepal and Pakistan where they thought the
population was becoming too large.13 They gave them all a free vaccination against smallpox;
but five years after receiving this vaccination, 60% of those inoculated were suffering from AIDS.
They tried to blame it on a monkey, which is nonsense. A professor at the University of Arkansas
made the claim that while studying the tissues of a dead chimpanzee she found traces of HIV.
The chimpanzee that she had tested was born in the United States 23 years earlier. It had lived its
entire life in a US military laboratory where it was used as an experimental animal in the
development of these diseases. When it died, its body was shipped to a storage place where it was
deep-frozen and stored in case they wanted to analyse it later. Then they decided that they didn't
have enough space for it, so they said, "Anybody want this dead chimpanzee?" and this researcher
from Arkansas said: "Yes. Send it down to the University of Arkansas. We are happy to get
anything that we can get." They shipped it down and she found HIV in it. That virus was acquired
by that chimpanzee in the laboratories where it was tested.14





that basically explains the whole monkey theory there is so much talked about the monkey theory wen takliun bout aids so thought id post since its used so many times in arguements

Originally Posted by Tha Q.

Oh...for the record, the theory that Apexx is referring to is one of MANY theories floating around

http://www.freeglossary.com/AIDS_conspiracy_theories


^^There are some more.


1

Originally Posted by Sean.C

aids came from monkey......and no no one fucked a monkey the tribes in the rain forest ate the monkeys and gained it like that........i didnt read what everyone posted so if they all ready said that then blow me

Originally Posted by Sean.C

meh worthless pitter patter.....the only thing that matters is what i say

Originally Posted by Apexx

In th face of dictionaries, medical science, disease tracking by the W.H.O. it self, hard documented evidence that shows no co-relation of AIDS to HIV, and a whoooooooooollllllllllleeeeeeeeeeee avalanche worth of evidence, you still ignore these? Of course you do. You had your mind made up before anyone said anything. To ignore facts is, well... the definition of ignorant. The definition in the same dictionaries that shape our entire language and grounds for comminucation, but you say is non-factual and proves nothing. Go fig.