should R.V have battle bored ranks??
 

u know to see who is the real champion insted of making all these top 10 list??

if there was ranking no-one would have to keep making these dumb treads like
who is in the top ten?
who is R.V best?
who u think are the best battler?

^^ with rankings there will never be another tread like these unless ignornat fools make'em


plus the top 3 should have R.V belts


what do ya think??

battle records also = ranking
but why not have a tread sticky of everyone record N have the top 3 with belts??

The tourneys have ranking........

and battle records in not a good way to judge raking as many..many..many..cats battle only newbs n shit just for the sake of a good record.So I think no.

no not tourney ranking

battle bored ranking

and it will help cuz if u have a good record then u can only battle good people for the belt

someoen with a record of like 43-0 vs 5-20 wONT HAPPEN

u know the front-line and elevated front-line should be basicly how u know if u battling someone good or not

exsample: front-line people with 20 wins and less
elevated front-line u ony battle people with 20 wins +
and also we should make a P.P.V tread for the people who battles for any of the belts

looks like your preaching on deaf ears

how wud u rank audio heads and text heads who don't battle?


hmmmm

I wud def. deserve to be ranked based on da simple fact I drop songs on this board.

no that wouldnt be too good of an idea.

Word, seems like an alright idea, Put battle recs too rankings, that way it could stop d/r'z because people wont wanna ride somebody to make them win and go higher in the ranking....

Who goes on goldmic.com?

They have rankings, and it works fine on their site......

thanks metafo now someone seening what im seening all the D/R will buckle-down
and all the people who is picking on newbies and shit like MOST of THESE so CALLED VETS DO wont keep happening cuz they have to battle better rank heads only

i say its a GO!!

Fuck that. Records don't decide shit. I've seen kids with perfect records, who were wack as hell.

Naw This Will Never Work Don't Change Nothing I Think It's Fine As It Is.

Really though, this was all inspired by duplicate threads. That happens all the time, and no matter how many ideas you com up with, it's not gonna stop.

9th Degree pretty much owned this thread.

Nice try, though.

Tell em lil sambo......................................

eh too much of a hassle and i think tis wakck....

If it was to keep all the threads from coming up, then yes, I think it would be a fine idea.

If it was just by record, than who cares, less threads.

My record sucks, but I am still considered a good writer. So ya. There are plenty of kids like that on this board. JTR record is kinda bad I believe?

yeah battle bored......lol...its board.....lol....bored.....lmfao......

Its board...not bored...


An they do have rankings...like killa said,Just join tha tourney's.

man this site will never grow up to be an expret in training rookies and making vets better

frontline rookie battles * 25 and under wins *
elevated frontline vets battles * 26 + wins to battle*

it will keep the vets from battling newbies and getting such a good record like king solo whos 73-30 i can bet u he have battle every single rookie on this site and probley a few vets and other people who s like 8-17 dont mean they weak its that they probley only battle vets so if u seperate the 2 u would have a board that is elevating there emcees think about it
only the morons wouldnt wanna try it at-less
but people who wanna better the site along with there own skills will give it a shot
like that old saying DONT KNOCK IT TILL YOU TRY-IT

Everybody battles newbs, it's nothing bad. Wait, you're a newb...nah, nevermind.

it is bad, when u building a rep off rookies
36-6 those 6 loss probley from real vets who OWNED you like pet's