|
War On Iraq? (Was It Worth It)
I did a research on the net alot of lives has been lost, They estimate it over 1000 trooops and even more iraqies being killed.
I ask for what? Bush said, "Iraq has Weapons Of Mass Destruction!" After an further investigation they found No weapons at all. Bush, Motivated troops by showin them 9-11 pictures, And as a soldier u have to fight for whats right. Bush Administration could not answer any questions about the war! Why is that? I found out that america went to war to protect the credibilty of United Nations. And not the protect the people of america. Bush also said, "Al Qeyda is linked to iraq (saddam) Well They captured saddam, what changed i ask? And after long period of the war Bush said," Iraq is not linked to al qeyda".......confusing aint it. And did america really went to "Free Iraq" as they said or to dehuminize them and abuse them in prisons (Every1 seen the pics of the abuse) Whats your view on this. Did you even know Why America went to war?..........Did you kno that Oil was the biggest reason for the war and not terrorism. .......................... |
Americans will pay for it in the future
|
^^yup u damn right..homey
|
Quote:
lol...well no one wants to see death n no one is there to see lives lost..however.. When the clinton admin. was running, they had several different attacks ranging from 93-2000 on the Pentagon along with the trade center along with being urged to reinforce there security through different helpads, along with making sure attacks like that where enhanced to avoid further casualities.. Clinton focused more on fixing the Health issue and then when bush coems into the adminstration he hired Condolleza rice along with reinstating powell.. Now...They had another attack, so if they had enhanced the security before it would have been preventable saving lives.. it wasnt so much him wanting americans to lose lives, n its not that he wanted to rack up a huge enough deficit to force americans to have to pay more but.. If someone didnt do it, who would? if he didnt put his foot in n take the casualities now to prevent further attacks, it would be a redudant cycles of attacks leading to further deaths not just on soldier but more on civilian casualities in key states.. Obviousley there are two sides to a story, but if America was more prepared to attacks through the urgencies pushed forth earlier on and chose to ignore it hoping it wouldnt happen again, its the mistake of the earlier goverment, not the current president for causing the lives.. There is blame on both sides, but you gotta be realistic n realize that puttin a goverment that can be run properly is what you need to do.. Whenever your in a lead position like that, you arnt there to please the minority of people against war, the majority of people for standardizing iraq (Polls clearly show bush polls increasing for security) your there to make sure your there to save your people, even Kerry his democratic opponent knows Bush's Key re-rellection key is National security, no one is gonna overlook it again n things need to get done quick or else other deaths are gonna be lost.. Look at it from both standpoints, holla back peace.. |
lol...
wtf is this First post bullshit i don' wanna see that..
I jus never registered shit, better start postin to relieve that shit haha.. |
Lil-trip: You seem to be confused into thinking that
(a) Clinton was "weak" on terrorism and Bush is "strong" on it or some such bullshit (b) That Iraq has jack shit to do with terrorism against the US or al-queda. (c) That the US is now safer than it was before we invaded Turn off the Fox "news" my man. |
Quote:
lol... There is no adminstration that is "Weak..' on terrorism, however if you wanna go off the Fox station n hit up a variety of news websites following what could have been done to prevent the war, they have several documents handed specifically to Clinton through his Security advisor stating Al qaida threats "Before..' the attack in 93, it was ignored along with his "Second.." term as president, about not enhancing the security due to the fact that it was a "Serious..' threat until after.. Along with before the election, they asked for funding to be put forth in those areas but it wasnt considered the Top..."Priority..' B.) Iraq wasnt the key area on the war in terrorism, n if you think im completly oblvious on the whole Oil aspect of it, you need to pick up another history book n skip the Binge cycle cus that was n aspect of well...but they needed to start where the attack came from, along with where it is "Spreading..' from.. C.) Going to war doesnt make anythign safer, n if you re-read n if you want i can get a printed document for your blind ass to read over the Brail i said no one wants to lose casualities, but sometiems pushin things forward is what is needed for the future.. So a typical reply "Fox..' news, shows how unaware you are of shit, n a simple re-reading over the post is just to answer the question, no one wants to go to war, n it is obviousley gonna make it more open for attacks Especially since get this dumbass, Osama was offering Britian one of the major countries to be supportin the war, to leave along with taking in various prisoners, same with Italy, HOSTAGES arnt safe n it arose more n he is offering money for the murder of High UN (UNITED NATIONS: thought thatd help) officials.. So now there are head bonuses bein put on officials, offering the murder within the united states and sorroundin countries, i think im more aware you need to get off the Google refreshn n skip past the top headlines n read over yo shit before you make another ass comment like that, cus not only did it not make sense but...all your comments where addressed in the first post, you jus sound like another dickridin bitch n if i was to compare it to a sport, don start watchin the "Winning..' team jus cus its leadin in scores, get the bare facts lol fuckin idiot... |
lol, aight n forgot to add...
The terrorist threat to our nation did not emerge on Sept. 11, 2001. Long before that day radical freedom-hating terrorists declared war on America and on the civilized world. The attack on the marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, the hijacking of the Achille Lauro in 1985, the rise of Al Qaeda and the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the attacks on American installations in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996, the East Africa bombings of 1998, the attack on the U.S.S. Cole in 2000. These and other atrocities were part of a sustained, systematic campaign to spread devastation and chaos and to murder innocent Americans.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/08/p...3320d4a&ei=5070 Jus opened up the browser n put n National security, NY times popped up along wit many, n right in some of the first openin statements, thought you wanted the background info since you skipped history 101, dumbass... |
Ok the point is. Why did they attack Iraq? Any reason? And what did America benefited from it? And i think Bush is a threat to world peace seriously.
And i am not saying...>Iraq is innocent....dont get me wrong. But i think this war with iraq now is pointless. point blank |
if Kerry became president
theres a chance that the terrorism will stop 'the terrorist want Bush dead, not the average American |
Quote:
Yeah..Kerrys plan is to withdrawl troops along with waiting for more UN support.. If the idea from any terrorist group would be, to withdraw the pressure n have more time to build up, i agree with everyones opinions here except that dumbass who made a comment n all his answers where in there, both you guys know what your talkin bout, not that frontin american hero lol, peace.. |
Kerry has different point of view about the war. Since he is democratic na'mean. But yea
...........Exercise your voting rights........... |
Quote:
Yep |
Quote:
Yep. |
Quote:
? u think the hate will stop just bceause a change in the head of a snake? |
First off the war on Iraq was to get rid of Sadam. That was Bush's goal. Notice how the war sort of fell apart after we "found" Sadam. The Kurds up north in fact had Sadam for quite some time before they turned him over to the USA.
Now you have to look at why terrorists attack Americans. They don't like us obviously, but why? It is because we have been messing around with the middle eastern nations for far too long. We go over there and fund one nation in a war, then attack that same nation in another. We assassinate presidents and instate people we see fit, people that fit the agenda that our politicians have. Most all of it is to keep oil prices low for our nation. We pay $2.00 now for a gallon, just about everywhere else it is roughly $4.00 a gallon. It is easy to see why radicals in the middle eastern nations have hate towards the USA. It is not because they hate our movies, or hate our freedom...haha that's kind of funny, what freedom? They hate us because of what we do to them. Clinton bombed Iraq, he didn't sit back. He just didn't all out invade the country like Bush has. The terrorists responsible for the 9/11 attacks were Saudi nationalists. We flattened Afghanistan, a country already in ruins to go after Saudi nationalists. Then we instated a new leader there and went after Iraq, a nation we were friends with durring their war with Iran. We flattened this country and turned it into a shit hole. Now we are instating a new president there and instating leaders our politicians see fit. Botom line: Blowing up Iraq and capturing Sadam did not make anybody more safe. It maybe made a few Iraqis more safe, but in actuality it made the Iraqis less safe. Look at what is going on there now. Rapes, robbery, crime has gone through the roof. It is known that support for Al Queda has increased among the muslims...Al Queda was never liked by the muslims to begin with. Iraq was never a threat to us. Bush told us it was. He lied and he still lies now, just like all of the other politicians you vote for to run this country. Don't think Kerry will fix things, because he won't. He is a politician just like Bush and he will grow the government and ruin things just as Bush has. |
Im for it and against it. IM for it cause those people needed some help, but im agaisnt it cause we are staying alot longer than we need to, you know?
|
They don't need help. Their country was in much better shape before we ever went over there. And if they did need help we still shouldn't help them.
|
Bush is the one that wants to grant amnesty to illegal aliens. Bush and Kerry are both horrible candidates.
|
bah wetbacks
|
we should have an open boarder, but illegals should not be able to easily get welfare (or get welfare at all) and things of the such. now illegals can come over, get pregnant and instantly get free care for their baby and live off of welfare.
get rid of welfare all together first. second, get rid of minimum wage so anybody can work for whatever they wish to...there are americans that would work for less than minimum wage right now, but they can't and so therefore illegals get the jobs. give the illegals no incentive to come over here other than the fact that they can possibly find work. do this and you will find that many of the mexicans will not come here. some still will, but many will not. originally immigrants came here because we were an actual free nation. one in which people could start a business without hastle from the government, and one in which you could worship what you wished. now immigrants come here because they can get on welfare, they get handouts that you and me have to pay for. |
Gays deserve rights too.... and kerry isn't "pushing it" , he's being wishy-washy on it like most politicians.
|
Hell nah it wasn't worth it, gas is like 2 dollars a gallon up here. Nah, but on the real, it was a stupid reason to start a war with dem niggaz over nothing.
~CJ~ |
Not worth it
Im a firm believer that it was all about the Oil. The war had no purpose, as soon as we rebuild Iraq, they will turn on the US...They're already turning...I say we just nuke Iraq and level it out. :shoot: :thefinger
|
Quote:
Why nuke iraq? they never did anything to us until we went over there and decided to mess with them. |
all i got to say is if a democrat was president and not a republican especially bush this shit wouldnt have happened
|
oh and, it isnt really worth it, soldiers are still dying and the war is over
|
Quote:
i wouldn't quite say that. we would have gone over there somewhere and done something. maybe not gone after iraq, but i'm sure afghanistan and maybe pakistan. |
hell no man the war wasnt justified a whole bunch of people have died for what? they havent found what they said they were going into war for in the first place and now their switching their reasons for going to war now as they did it to free the iraqi people.. thats total bullshit.. its not believable that the us would spend billions of dollars and lose thousands of soliders lives just because they wanted to help another nation
|
Yup. I guess America wants to dominate the world. Iraq Vs Iran war america suplied weapons to iraqies and also iranians......aint that...such a good thang as americans......
|
Well,as an American citizen....the war in iraq itself wasn't worth it.But it did give Bush a good reputation since Saddam got caught.Before the war...Bush had absoluttley no chance of winning another election....but now he does.So as a citizen...the war was not worth it....but for bush....it was perfect.
|
actually this war has really hurt bush. if he didn't go to war i think he would have had a better chance at the presidency a second time around. either way it really doesn't matter, a bad president will be elected.
|
New president will be elected yup. Bye bye bushy
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM. |