Why humans evolved to walk upright, and an explanation for BREASTS!!!!!!
 

Evolutionarily speaking, humans used to walk on all fours like our other primate cousins. There are a number of reasons humans adapted and evolved to walk upright. When our early ancestors lived on the open grasslands of Africa, it was hard to see predators approaching over the horizon being on all fours. Therefore, the pressure was to either walk upright to survive, or face death at the mouth of a large predator cat.

Now, when human females walked on all fours, the protruding butt was the major attraction to males when it came to courtship and mating. However, when humans begin to walk upright, this feature became less prominent, thereby causing males to not want to mate with those females. It's believed that large breasts developed in humans as an adaptation to this dillema. If you look closely, the shape of a woman's breast coupled with the cleavage mirrors the primeval human butt when we walked on all fours. Therefore, males are genetically inclined to be attracted to breasts because it reminds them of the butt, which reminds them of mating--i.e., sex.

Oh, I thought it had something to do with them being consealed. People usually want what they can't have or what they're deprived of.

naw...it's all genetic and instinct...It was Natural Selection in operation...Males weren't as attracted to females because the once protruding butt became flat. So, breasts evolved to ensure the survival of the species. Otherwise, they'd have teets or orangutan tits. lol

Hmm...

Interesting theory.

yes...it's a working theory...But, one thing is for sure, human females used to have orangutan tits.

i like large breast more than i like a nice ass
Word

I dont.....the girls gotta have ass.....

I bet you don't even realize that you're attracted to breasts because your DNA compels you to be drawn to them. haaaaa

Odd. Here I was thinking that the male species of any breed, particularly human, were attracted to the female breasts because it is the source of nutrients for a child and therefore ensures a higher likelyhood of that offspring surviving - which is the point of mating. "Bigger breasts = more milk for offspring" is the name of the evolutionary game. The female hips are seen as "attractive" because the wider a females hips, the higher the lilkeyhood of her having successful child birth, a more painless one, and increased odds of her survival during that process. The butt is attractive because it is evidence of her storage of her own body fat to sustain her own health while she births and nurses a child. Breasts, hips, ass, youth, hair, skin, etc. etc. are all reflections of health and ability to successfully concieve in a female mate, and we still subconciously connect to these traits today. Evolutoion is what defined attraction, and attraction is what shaped desire, which therefore shaped pleasure. Not the other way around.

of course but for me she has to have some nice tits
i had a girl one time whos tits mad up for the ass she was 36 double d
some nice ass shit

That's not completely correct. What you just stated is an anthropocentric and rather arrogant assertion. Do chimpanzees rationalize the amount of milk a breast can hold? No. Sexuality is probably one of the most primeval and powerful desires we have that's innate. As far as I know, you don't have to be taught to be attracted to someone. It's driven by genes. I agree that shape, size, and a healthy appearance all give rise to someone being "fit for mating", but it's beyond rationalization. We're able to rationalize it because we're people. But, even Birds are drawn to other birds with fewer or no "defects". Humans are related to other primates, genetically speaking. And, from studying other ape species, they've come to certain conclusions. One conclusion is that human behavior doesn't differ much from chimps. And, looking at chimp behavior offers a window into our own past. Also, these adaptations take thousands of years. We're not talking without a lifetime. It's almost completely random. Animals don't "choose" features because they are "better." Certain features happen to be "chosen", thereby, eliminating other features that weren't. That = Natural Selection. There is no "point" to natural selection. It's merely adaptations to environmental pressures. That also means there is no such thing as an "evolutionary ladder." It's a myth.

^ also the human female is the only animal that can have sex in all 3 stages

missionary
doggy

and wuts da other one? I forget


lol




j/k

^no before her puberty during puberty and after menopause

I was jus jokin bro


But, humans aren't the only animals that have sex for reasons other than to procreate, believe it or not.

well which other ones can i was watchin this last night on discovery channel
they said humans were the only ones.

1st of all, humans only have 2 sexes. But, there are certain species of Protists that have dozens of sexes.

^^Just an interesting tidbit.

Neway...Certain ape species engage in social control through the use of sex, as human prisoners would.

first of all i refuring to the stages in there life
and i thought protist werent classified a as animals

YESS!!! THEY DO!! Fortunately for them, breast milk production is irrelevant to fat content, unlike humans, which is why their breasts are shaped completely differently than a humans. Fortunately for us, we're not talkign about chimpanzees, we're talking about humans. If you disagree, simply look up 'evolution of sexual attraction through neccessity'.



Dolphins.

I know...that's why I said an interesting Tidbit...


I don't know of any animals that have sex just to do it. But, I do know certain social apes have used sex as a form of control. I'll get back to you on it.

i guess apexx schooled tha Q