Why do people think that if you stop responding in a thread
 

That you're avoiding or "running" from someone?

Yep,
This is the official...Get every net-concern off your e-chest thread!


Seriously...Since when did someone have to agree with you for you to be "right"?

If I state what I have to state, I'm done with it unless I see something else worth replying to. If I don't respond, that doesn't mean I'm "running" or "scared" of someone...That's ridiculous.

Then, again, do people actually sign off RV at any time? Like, you make comments, then you go to cook dinner or run errands. By the time you return, some loud mouth is saying, "HAHA @ Q. You ran from so and so."

Like, what the heck is there to be "scared" of, the many D/Rs that flock in argument threads?

PSSF

STOP IT.


Yes...this is get everything off my chest day.

i hate that too........................

No offense, but isn't that every day?

Not everyday, but it should be...keeps you from blowing up


Go ride Apexx some more then pretend that you're a neutral 3rd party. :nono:

:thumbup:

Lol, so now if I reference someone ONE TIME I'm a rider?

Sorry bro, this wouldn't make the first time. I mean, if you're an Apexx supporter and a Q hater, that's fine. But, at least be real about it. People who back me make it known. They don't pretend what they stand for.

Gee...

*Thinks back to a thread I made called "ask me what I think about you"*


*Remembers my comments to 9th about him being "ambiguous"*


Bro...I swear my intelligence will need therapy after all these insults.



1

Also, why is it that people think you're "running" from an issue if you choose not to answer them?

Doesn't someone have a right to not answer a question?



1

What am I pretending that I stand for? I support neither you or Apexx, nor do I have a problem with either of you. I don't give a damn what anybody thinks of me on the internet. But apparently you think I do, so I guess we've figured it out now.

fight fight fight virbal style............

U know what's interesting...and I'm not beating a dead horse here...

Lots of people like to say, "I'm not defending Apexx or so-and-so, yet their comments are remarkably anti-Q.

Crazy Hades is just one example of this. He came in a thread where Apexx and Nos were basically calling me a moron, ignored that, and said, "Q, that was wrong what you said."

^^Then, when I addressed him on that double standard, he replied, "I wasn't taking anyone's side."

^^U see where the contradiction lies? Anyway, I don't care bro. I'm just stating the facts. I don't need validation on my beliefs. I just find it all interesting.

PS...Why did you try to instigate something between me and Apexx earlier then?

That's what I want to know. You and LF both. She fed right off of you.

That's the crap that ticks me off for real. You and I were having a discussion and you brought Apexx up. Why? What are your motives? THink about it son. You know the deal. Don't act all innocent.


1

I don't know how making an "anti-Q' statement automatically makes someone "pro-Apexx". You mean nobody can have their own problem with you?

Ok, so I was talking about you always making threads because you're upset about an arguement with someone. I used Apexx as an example. Shit, I could've used Triple_N, leady, probably several other examples too.

Would you like me to change that post to say "You always make threads when you're upset about an arguement, like you did with leady"?

^^Here's an example of how you SELECTIVELY SEE what you want.

Bro, Apexx made a thread CALLING ME OUT, period. I responded to that thread. Wait...I guess you didn't see him make TWO threads singling me out?

^^Prime example of what I'm talking about...Again, I could give a SPIT what you think about my beliefs. But, don't make comments about me "making threads against Apexx" when that's untrue and inflammatory.

Again, I ask, why did you bring up religion and Apexx in that thread? What did that have to do with yours and my discussion?

If I was having the same discussion with him, I proabaly would've used that as an example.

*bets money Q's homepage is RV rofl*

Making an anti-Q statement in the context of it agreeing with Apexx makes you pro-Apexx, especially if you've done it on more than one occasion.

Then again, maybe it is coincidence. If that's the case, then why bring that up when it's a moot point, considering I only did that in response to someone else doing it? The person you used as an example did it, and yet you only commented on me doing it. So, that's where I get the pro-Apexx from.


1

Once again, if I was addressing him, I would've commented on him doing it too.

bull --ish




but aiight bro...

I'm imagining people trying to instigate beef...okay sure


*Thinks about a thread called "Tha Q's Prayer* made by Apexx...

Sure...that wasn't inflammatory...

Did I make a thread countering that? NO.



1

Did I go in that thread supporting him? No.

Ur initial comment was, "Then you make threads when Apexx disagrees with your beliefs."


^^That's proof positive that I don't. I've never made a thread because "Apexx" didn't agree with my beliefs.

Correction. My actual statement was...
"Disagrees with your beliefs and shit."

Since you love exploiting the smallest aspects of things, the "and shit" constitutes that your beliefs are not the only reason you would make a thread in regards to Apexx.

Nah bro...cuz the context was that Apexx disagreed with things I hold true, like religion. I don't make threads aimed at Apexx. My point was, the only time I did so was because he blatantly singled me out and I responded by making a separate thread. Then, in the normal Q-hating fashion, I was told, "All you had to do was reply in the original thread." To which I replied, "All Apexx had to do was PM me and not try to single me out in front of everyone."

^^^^Again, I couldn't care less about what he or anyone thinks of my beliefs. It's so pointless.


1

Eh, conversation with you has become uninteresting. I'd rather have a sandwich anyways.

Now folk, based on the title of this thread, I could say, "HAHA, 9th is runnin scared."


^ppssf

Now, you know how I feel 9th when you and LF bring up Apexx when he's so irrelevant. I am not hitched to that nigga.

Sorry bro, I don't know how you feel. I don't catch feelings over the internet.

Of course you don't...ur just the a-hole sayin dumb --ish to tick me off...then claim it's with no intent.


:thumbup:


Right on

The doctor sure doesn't feel the prick of the needle...the patient does.

ok this is officially the.........9th and Q.....git shit off your E-chest thread...........

Or more like the "9th doesn't really care, so Q can stop whenever he wants" thread.

or more like "Let's pretend we don't care when we do" thread.








1

How? It's pretty evident that you're not pretending not to care.

And, considering the fact that you continue to respond shows that you care about what I think about what you care about.

Not really. I'm just responding. I said I'm ready to stop whenever you are.

I'm just responding now too...I'm hungrier than a MOE...Why don't you share some of that sandwich you're eating? Be a comrad!

I decided that I'll just go to Wendy's instead. But they tried to overcharge me last time, so I might have to bring my whup-ass stick.

Wendy's is decent. But, there's something missing from their burgers...I dunno wut it is, but it's definitely something missing.

*thinks back to when I worked at Wendy's as a teenager*

ahhh...those WEREN'T the days

Yeah, I don't really get burgers unless I'm at a sit-down restaurant.

I perfer chicken, and Wendy's has a pretty good spicy chicken.

EL EM AYE OH


but how did I know this is yet another Q-thread about apexx

and wtf are "net concerns"?

Psh...yeah, keep mentioning my name, Q. Thinking I'm out to get you when I haven't shown anything but neutrality...I've argued with Apexx, your main 'archnemesis'. I've argued with you about time machines, in which you --- god forbid --- refused to disclose further information on the basis 'I have better things to do'. Ha...ha.

You think I care about the way the thread was shown to you? I picked one thing out of many, as I've explained, because I didn't feel like typing up a bunch a shit and getting caught in the middle of a debate. So, leave my name out of your petty little squabbles.

For the ignorant person who said my homepage was RV, it's Cnn.com

Try it...

You might learn something.


Dumb homophobe


1

cnn.com

has golf-related things.

on it.