Iran is tempting fate...
 

Iran has enriched Uranium in an attempt to develop nuclear power. The president of Iran claims it's for peaceful purposes, such as nuclear power plants. But, the U.S. government and United Nations watchdogs believe Iran has ulterior motives for the nuclear technology mainly because of the aggressive rhetoric used by its president. There are now rumors that if diplomacy fails, the U.S. government may launch a nuclear attack against Iran as a last resort if they don't cease and desist with the development of their own nuclear program.

All I have to say is...GET READY FOR WAR



Holla




1

how are housing costs in canada?

nuclear war = children being born even decades from now looking like Latinkitten

oh god

good thing my daughter already born

^^^ but i ain't got kids yet :(

LOL


dat is sooooo "wrong"




lol

Heavy stuff.

Bush will end up firin that shit.

and i will be in norhtern canada wif da eskimos

^^Yea...cuz the president of Iran doesn't seem to be backing down...He feels it's his and his country's right to develop nuclear technology. It just so happens the US and the United Nations disagree. The timeline will be crucial here.

As long as this shit is monitored by the UN we'll be alright............

ill kick them in there nuts...one by one

why should everyone but them be allowed to develop their nuclear technologies? also, lets prevent a nuclear war, by starting a nuclear war!

good thang im in Canada :cool:

*remembers how close i am 2 New York*

fuck...

*paddles across ocean 2 Spain*

:cool: palabra

The UN and the US want to prevent Iran from developing warheads because they'll just use them to destroy Israel and other non-aggressive countries.

Futhermore, if the US bombs Iran with nuclear warheads, there won't be a nuclear war. That'll be the end of it for a while. Senator Joe Lieberman doesn't think the US can permanently disable Iran's nuclear program, only set it back by attacking them.

The last thing this world needs is for Iran to be a nuclear power. The president keeps claiming it's for civil purposes but THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A NUCLEAR REACTOR. Lmao...that to me is just hilarious.

But I hope Bush doesn't try to fix this shit on his own. The international community won't be too pleased...

this is cool.

A nuclear war, to prevent nuclear war. And the man behind it, bush.

i think a man this stupid should be allowed to command war's, he's a dictator.

When all this shit with suddam hussian was going down, i allways thought. The most logical way to sort it, is bush and hussain have a one out, fist to fist, like men.
This should be the same with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
I know someone will read this and say " thats not even level headed" or somthing along those lines. but it makes more sense than threatning them with a nuclear war, to prevent a nuclear war.

There is no democracy in america.

If USA posseses nuclear why can other countries have it!

I been saying this for a while now. But brainwashed americans allways have the same reply of " those who had nuclear weapons before the Un stated no one is to have nuclear weapons can keep them"

oh,ok, so anyone whos family was using child labour before 1912 when the law changed and stated "no children used for labour" are allowed to keep using child labour.

get the fuck out of here, america is full of double standerds.

the US hates when anybody else gets weapons to protect them selves. Got forbid Iran says "yeah we got neuclear weapons because we saw what happened to iraq and their oil soo......try it on us and we'll blow you off the map 'kay?"

I think you are uhm underestimating the danger of Iran possessing nuclear power. This is the last thing the world needs, especially after several threats towards Israel and the chaotic situation over there.

A lot of lobbying from the international community will be needed...

^^easy for you to say. I think the US should sit down and shut the fuck up for a change and let other people work their own shit out. we can't even work our own shit out and get peace in our own land, how are we gonna help others get it in theirs?


If Iran wants to nuke Israel, the global community would never let it happen since so many people across the world are jews. But as usual, the US wants to be the first one on the scene! The instigator and the fighter! "Oh shit..there's somebody with REAL neucular weapons this time instead of the war we've been fighting in a place that turned out to have none?? LETS GET EM!!!" fuck that. I got enough shit to focus on than having to include some cocksucker with a missile.

Please read my previous post. I clearly stated I believe it'd be best for the US NOT to do this on their own but help out under the wings of the international community.

1. Iran would never lay a finger on Israel due to Israel's Arrow interception system, let alone America.
2. There is a major difference between weapon's grade uranium for a nuclear warhead capable of any worry and the use of nuclear technology for development uses...
3. America has nukes, as do several other countries...Iran is trying to catch up, and if you don't have a nuclear warhead, you really don't have anything to back you up. This is based off the assumption that Iran's intentions are at all related to a WMD.

No worries.

Nuclear war + fragile earth

Great.

^^You got it right...Islamic countries don't like Israel for the simple fact they're Jewish. An attack on Israel will not be tolerated and the US will defend her at all costs.




1

^^And, the US believes Iran has those intentions. Bush has made it clear that enrichening Uranium is an act of aggression on their part, regardless of why Iran claims to be doing it. Even so, Iran is probably months away, possibly a year, from having weapons grade Uranium.

I'm not so concerned about the issue, seeing as how this quote seems to show that Iran doesn't have hostile intentions:



Bush would be seriously fucked if he nukes them without being nuked in the first place...even though the nukes would undoubtedly be intercepted. The chances of Iran hitting Israel --- which has the best intelligence in the world, basically --- are slim, and there are many factors that could contribute to not hitting the places they could actually strike.

Isolationism may be one of the ideal choices in this matter...letting the problem resolve itself, unless intervention is necessary. As long as America is not hit, is there a reason to be involved? I don't know, I'm not much for reading the minds of politicians, but I know I'm not troubled by the news.

Based on what research?












1

Dude we'll fuck them people up in iran.

please read MY prior post. I tihnk it'd be best for the U.S. not to get involved AT ALL!! Our forces are already WAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY over stretched as it is.

^ lmao I never thought of that in that way.

http://www.strategypage.com/dls/art...05928225632.asp
http://www.scarecrowpress.com/Catal...data=081085581X

There's a few things for you, showing that Israel may not necessarily have the BEST, but it's up there...Iran really doesn't have much on Israel.

I'm really not all that concerned, and I don't see much reason to be.

haaa...u keep sayin "im not concerned"...that makes it seem like you are for real...

Hey...I'm just relaying the news and speculating...

I do think the US is serious about strikes on Iran though...cuz they don't appear to be backing down

this is the exact mentality your government is creating within the youth of america.

I'll sleep well at night whether iran has nukes or not. Cuz you can't defend your self from it either way. Might as well be woried about a meteor busting through your roof and cracking your head open in your sleep.

Or maybe I'm just saying 'I'm not concerned' to show that I'm not concerned.

If the US does strike Iran, it's going to have to answer to a lot...especially after that quote I showed you.

I love the way Americans assume dere invincible....no doubt your the gulliest militay power in the world but Iran, if Bush fucks wid dem, ur country best be ready for some body-bags in serious numbers on home soil or otherwise. There is a SERIOUS reason, bush is being careful about what deadlines etc how he goes about the Iran situation, and its barely to do with him trying to reserve international pressure. Iran have sum thigns ready and prepared i can gurantee it. A president who says live to his people with there SUPPORT " I will turn my country'a land into a battlefield before I bow to America" aint fucking around and if u watch the nigga talk, man is str8 missin sum screws...If Iran stand up in a tangible way to the USA, i can see them attaining serious arba/middle easter/north african support along wid euuropean backin from ppl like chiraq....

Ima sit back and watch dis shit...cos dis shit WILL be no Iraq where yall niggaz merk motherfuckers in 2weeks...dis gon be some 4month long shit, wid sum serious warfare...

holla back

http://acuitydesignz.moonfruit.com

lol i was talking about if we went to war with them. We would try to help them create a new government after we kill people there.

I love the way that all other countries assume that all Americans fit into a nice stereotype package...but, I guess, it really doesn't matter, you're referring to 'THOSE' Americans, I presume. In all honesty, I can't see much of what Iran can do to the US...other than suicide bombers...If it comes down to a nuclear war...there'll be heavy casualties...but America and Israel and the others who would probably team up have some sophisticated shit, bro...guess it all depends.

Wanna make a bet on which side wins, in case of a war?

read what man has said...we all KNOW dere can and will only be one winner if war was 2 even come...im jus saying, expect sum serious resistance and not kids slingin rocks...