![]() |
Bush knocked down the towers.
|
your in danger of being branded a conspiracy theory nut...............
you'll be the 1st one they'll detain during martial law didnt you know? those who disagree with the official story are terrorist appeasers? rumsfield didnt tell you huh? |
lol w/e Fuck Bush
|
Bin Laden didnt blow up the projects it was you nigga tell the truth nigga, [/Mosdef] Bush Knocked down the towers [/Jadakiss] word....... |
Quote:
And that's why i'm proud to be a Canadian. I'd love to see them cross the boarders to come get me. It'd never happen. :shoot: |
yo, if they come looking for me and i need to skip the country think ya moms'll let me stay in the crib?
ill pay for room and board lol you lucky canadien bastard you |
Lol, sure aslong as you smoke your weed outside.
|
we can put a towel under the door and turn the hot water on
dont you know the schemes man? nah but for realio i hope people read these threads and use their gullible minds to think man im feeling like immortal technique lol |
i dont feel like watching 1hr n half of this |
i've seen this shit already
|
Loose Change Part II
It's on youtube. You can buy it. I'd recommend it, i totally believe it was set up EDIT - Just noticed.. this is loose change part 2 :) |
shut up
1 |
Quote:
Are you still butthurt because I dissed you for being wack on the mic? Sheesh, I just figured if you could take a fucking dick then you could take a joke :thumbup: |
I've seen this and I don't think Bush knocked down the towers. Luckily I don't care what anybody else thinks.
|
Yeah, so, Jack, have you ever looked at the facts presented by the other point of view? Or are you taking one video to heart, using your bias against Bush for justification for not looking at the facts countering what Loose Change and other videos like it provide? There are quite a few things Loose Change got incorrect.
|
Quote:
What things? Provide evidence. |
Quote:
^ yeah, and see thats the thing... i agree that our government hides alot from us and we really probably do not know exactly what happened on that day, but Jack you present finding a video such as this as "research" and evidence... when its not. |
theres lot of sites out there that you can do your own research on
dont rely on that video jack posted, thats just one form of info if you agree with the official story and the direction of this country' thats you but if you have doubts you should research it, see for yourself and make your own conclusions....... |
|
ive watched several videos.
and i know alot of the info they use to get their conclusions and fight their argument is true... the pentagon crash and the pittsburgh one looked NOTHING like a plane crash site... no bodies, no wreckage(mainly the pittsburgh one as the petagon one had building wreckage but no plane wreckage) and its impossible for the plane to decintigrate(sp?) and i looked up on that part myself and what the people say in the video about that is 100% true. and when you concider that security in the building was lowered beyond beleife, sniffer dogs(for explosives) were removed so on n so forth, not far from the day it happened in the twin towers... guess who was the only person with the power to do that??? george bush's brother. again i checked up on that, and its true... there are several places around the pentagon with cctv facing the direction of the pentagon, the fbi confiscated all of them, and only one was released from the pentagon grounds(all of 5 frames) looks NOTHING like a plane hitting it(looks way too small and explodes nothing like a plane would). do research before drawing up conclusions is all im going to say. |
Quote:
you and jack should video link battle or something theres more to this than one video link man |
That's funny, BECAUSE IT'S NOT A FUCKING VIDEO LINK. It's a site specifically aimed at CTists, full of scientific proof, reports talking about how a controlled demolition actually takes place, the impossibility of bombs actually being planted without some kind of alien technology, pictures of different sides of the tower, and everything that a CTist would cry about.
Maybe if you clicked the link you'd realize it's not a video link, aye? You sure got me on that one. |
ok im reading it now
its still only ONE source i can flood this shit with links that say the exact opposite but go reply to the other thread |
One source? Uh, there are plenty more. Want me to find them? Not to mention that site is full of links that support their information and discuss everything. It's not one source, it's one entity made of several sources.
|
Quote:
What's your point? Jack only posted one source. There are tons of links that present theories and tons of links that attempt to debunk those theories. You choose what you want to believe, but don't act like there's a lack of information from one side, so the side that you believe must be correct. That's bullshit, man. |
Quote:
Never noticed that. 1. The frames don't take into account the speed of the plane and whatnot. I'm thinking that the frames themselves are too primitive to capture the sight of a 500+ mph plane in 5 frames. You might see a blur. 2. Of course you're going to confiscate the tapes, it's called evidence. Not evidence to conspiracy theory, evidence that should be reviewed so that an official report could be filed. It's quite obvious they'd want all the information they could get. 3. The security wasn't lowered beyond belief. Actually, a bomb threat was called in and dogs were brought in. They didn't detect any thousands of pounds of bombs inside of the building, and thus were removed. Tell me, do you think there was enough of a period for "them" to secretly implant the necessary bombs, seal up all evidence, and move out? That's really stretching it. I can understand where you're coming from, but there are explanations. It may seem shady they're confiscating tapes, but there is a legitimate explanation to that (even though it may not be true, and they were actually disposing of incriminating evidence). But tell me, does it make any fucking sense they're going to have eye witnesses that see it? Why would they fabricate the lie of a plane crashing into it? Why not hi-jack one of their own planes and crash it into the building, instead of going through the rigorous, unrewarding process of emptying the building of all its employees and systematically inserting explosives? And by the way, the entire destruction of the WTC resembles a demolition in pretty much no way. Even if the Towers didn't come down, they'd be killing less of their employees while still having the justification of a terrorist attack. They made sure to kill about 99.9% of their employees by planting bombs, when they could've simply built off the original story and crashed their own planes? Not buying it. |
![]() *dribbles* soz to go off topic |
who IS that bitch anyway ?
|
Quote:
not buying it????? then youre just another puppet on the governments strings. |
Quote:
i don't know...but all i know is i wanna fuck her at LEAST 3 times in each shirt :hump: maybe more...i unno what with my sex life at the mo i'm feelin a lil dry :evilgrin: |
So you wanna tell me an air plane can hit 5 light polls before crashing to the ground, and not damage a single light pole, instead, they'd just pop right out of the ground like they did at the pentagon? That's stretching it.
There's a lot of points and counterpoints that can be made, as you said. What we have to take into consideration is that we might never know the truth, we just choose what we wish to believe. All i'm doing is providing information for people so that they too can choose to believe or not. Nah sayin! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM. |