|
Version Three vs Bomber-Z
Battle Rules:
topic: Has to be someone from Shady Records No Crew Votes No Reused sigs No Biting Minimum posts to vote: 20 Check in by: 01-28-05 at 05:34 PM Must drop verse in 180 minutes after check in. |
Version Three has ACCEPTED this battle on 01-28-05 05:07 PM.
|
Bomber-Z has ACCEPTED this battle on 01-28-05 05:10 PM.
|
|
 |
Voted For: Bomber-Z
I've seen that backround on IFSZ... ------------ Skin Zone... it was an abstract piece. Removed |
wow holy shit.
my computer is fucked up... DQ that vote, it was feedback. |
no.. thats not where I got it from!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
lol, idk im just sayin that i saw it there.
|
Voted For: Version Three
v/ version version- yo sigs startin to look the same man... i like the brown, colors all work really really well... hate the font city was a bad choice for a backround i think brushing was kinda jsut randomizing... 6/10 Bomber- probably one of the best sigs ive seen you do... couldve blended everything better though... i dont like the font though, or how you blended it with the backround, it makes it hard to see... i do like the backround however i dont thikn you made it though, which doesnt win you any points in my book, but if you did then props... 5/10 overall version wins it with blending, and colors... pretty weak abttle though... |
Voted For: Version Three
Votin Version 3 on dis,,, Im likin version 3's font betta although tis slightly illegible..im likin the colur scheme of version 3 aswell its different...werent likin BOmber Z's sig wid the played eminem pic and his text is hard to read...I think v3 bg fits more with the sig than bomberz's random blue 1 which does not correlate withe pic...no ho y'all PEAce RTF : http://community.rapverse.com/showthread.php?t=173739 |
Voted For: Bomber-Z
ok version nice how you kept it simple here browns and dark coloring was coo nice cutting and overall good shit but this is hands down bomber z here his coloring is fucking dope background is ill as shit as is the writing style he used eminem looks like he popping out the pic like its on tv this is a dope sig and had madd energy to it thats what made it better cuz version your sig is kinda dull in aspect to it |
Voted For: Version Three
Bomber-Z Your sig was decent, but lacked creativity.. All you did was put up a backround, paste a picture, then post a font with some text on it.. The backround doesnt fit with the picture at all.. its just random.. The font is pretty dope.. the picture is good, but it just doesnt fit with anything.. just a random image to fit the criteria.. You didnt make the rest of the sig relate to it at all.. Version Three Your backround is pretty good.. the lines over it look pretty nice as well.. I like how the color fixes everything together.. pretty good image.. i dont really like the first font.. the second one is dope though.. Overall Bomber-Z had the better font.. Version Three had the better backround.. color scheme.. and image.. so basing off of that.. Version Three gets my vote.. VOTE - VERSION THREE |
Voted For: Version Three
Version Three: loved the colors you used and the background was real nice to. Everything blended it in real well, also the picture. Can't really give any bad comments on this one, definately feeling it. Good job! Bomber-Z: the pic was nice and all but I wasn't really feeling the background, was little too light and hectic. The letters didn't come out that good, should've used bit darker blue in the background or darker blue font with the words...No hate though...was just feeling Version Three's sig bit more... |
Voted For: Version Three
version got this as his seemed to flow better and it looked like you spent a lot more time on it than bomber. Bomber, the pic and the bacground dont go together well and the subtext is hard to read, does it say dont hold m*e back?!!?!?!?! not a bad battle but bomber could have come harder. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM. |
