This is just pityfull
 

KNOXVILLE, Tennessee (AP) -- Less than a week after filing a class-action lawsuit because of her outrage over Janet Jackson's Super Bowl stunt, Terri Carlin believes she's made her point.

The Knoxville banker is withdrawing the suit filed last Wednesday in U.S. District Court against Jackson and Justin Timberlake, along with MTV, CBS and their parent company, Viacom.

The lawsuit had sought billions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.

Carlin alleged that she and others who watched the show during the Super Bowl were injured by the performers' lewd actions when Timberlake tore off part of Jackson's costume, exposing her right breast.

The notice of dismissal filed in federal court says Carlin wants to see if "remedial measures" announced by federal regulators and the companies involved succeed in preventing similar stunts.

Carlin and attorney Wayne A. Ritchie II, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Carlin and has represented her for free, have received phone calls and mail from hundreds of supportive parents from across the country who wanted to be included in the suit, the notice states.

In the lawsuit filed on behalf of "all Americans," Carlin charged that Jackson's exposure and "sexually explicit conduct" by other performers during the halftime show injured viewers.

Jackson apologized for the incident, saying a red lace garment was supposed to remain over her breast when an outer garment was ripped away.


Now if she filed it on behalf of "all americans" would we get some of that chedder?Doubt it.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,110630,00.html

^ Original Article.

It was only a tit, not a live blowjob on national TV. I think all the controversy about this topic is lame.

lmmfao, how did the naked titty injure her?

It's "pitiful", by the way.

I think that America's concepts of morality are ridiculous.
OMG!!!!111 I'M SURE THAT TEHY'RE GONNA BE SCARRED 4 LIEF NOW!!111 THOES POOR CHILDREN!!1111 OMFG!!111

Seriously, that's pathetic. By that logic, I'm going to file a suit against all mothers who've breastfed their children. The entire sexual taboo thing is fucking puritanistic. You'd think everyone was living in Victorian England.

people act like their children have to go to therapy now and are scarred for life..like their ten year old kids have never seen a tit before

I personally am offended that it didn't last longer and she didn't show both tits!!Lets all Sue for that

Its They're by the way
Its The by the way (not those)

It's called sardonicism via AOL speak. Hence the 1's in place of exclamation marks.

so 'TEHY'RE' isn't a Typo? And if u speak AOL talk then u are on the internet way to much.

this topic isnt done with yet

halftime is ovewrshadowing a great super bowl

really sad

Duh. Should I have put "their" and made it more obviously retarded? And I don't even have AOL. It's a term which is derived from the infamy of the illiteracy of AOL users.

"AOL lets stupid people on the net. No wonder they're number one!"

O NO I SEEN A TIT....MY YOUNG LIFE IS FOREVER RUINED!!

*Goes Back To Porn*


How Stupid Is This Bitch

You Tellin Me She Aint Got No Breasts...She Sees Everytime Shes Naked...

Ppl Are Stupid

It's only because it was a black woman, a successful black woman.

Why is she getting all the flak, JUSTIN DID IT! SHEEEEESH, he said, "i'll have you naked by the end of this song", and ripped her damn tit out! Noooo, all you hear is Jackson this Jackson that, the burn both the siblings while we're at it.

Like three girls kissing (christina madonna & britney), wasn't pure soft porn. That shit has disappeared, no apologies or nothing....
Amerikkka

There was actually a star covering the nipple I recall, but don't quote me on that one.

It's a freakin' boob, what did they ever do to you besides provide foreplay? :nono:

Oviously This Women Was A Nun Or Somthing, And The Only Person That Boob Would Of Hurt Was Poor Jt, Could Of Poked His Eye Out Ya Know!!!