![]() |
NEW SIG...a must peep from a gfx vet:)
wit...or witout the scanlines??....that i made of course... :thumbup: |
ight pretty good, let me break it down
the quality of the picture is ok, but keep it as scanlines Background is pretty good for a grudge/abstract effect you might want to take the scanlines off the font and just have it on the background, it will bring the font out more Overall really good sig 18/20 (I dont do the ten point scale anymore, its too basic.) |
thats some tight shit fam am feelin it..........9/10
|
I dont like it that much really it not bad tho..
Im Not Feeling The Font Really And The Sub-Text Is kinda hard to read..Quality is ok...not the best... I have seen you post some better gFx 8/10 no hate -1 |
i like it....
everything works well..... only thing i really dont like is the bevel or w/e on the font...it was the wrong font to use it on.... 8/10.... nice work... |
diabolic = fake trend setter :nono: hahaha i wuz tha 1st 2 do a which one iz better scanline or no scanline sig.....but people r whack an don't understand lines so i like tha scanline one
|
well nah...i already used scanlines so i didnt wanna go overboard...:p
|
i think the scanlines would be best, but put the layer behind the text or change the opacity. nice sig thow 9/10
|
iight dis is wut i think first of all its too small, second of all the font or color doesnt really match the pic, and third of all it's better w/o scanlines smell me i'd say 7/10 good try tho fam overall its dope 1
|
up...............
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM. |