Ne one else going to see World Trade Center tomorrow?
 

I think I'm going to check it out, God willing. It looks promising, just as United 93 was.










1

yes i am, but only to see how oliver stone tells the story
peep this article
http://www.prisonplanet.com/article...6Leafleting.htm
they're gonna be handing out leaflets of information pertaining to the anomalies of thats days events
the leaFLETS will basically say


"The film you just saw was a visceral portrayal of the horrifying events of 9/11. But did you notice the anomalies?

WTC7: Late in the film and late in the afternoon, WTC building 7 collapsed, even though it wasn't hit by a plane. WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein even admitted on PBS that it was intentionally demolished. That kind of controlled demolition implies explosives planted weeks in advance.

Bombs in the towers: The WTC towers themselves fell at approximately freefall speed; again pointing to a planned, controlled demolition. This is reflected in the film’s portrayal of explosives going off in the tower before the collapse. Real FDNY firefighters reported those explosions.

Molten metal: Stone’s film also accurately portrays the molten metal pouring from the towers before collapse. Burning jet fuel
can’t melt steel. Dr. Steven Jones of BYU tested samples of the towers and found evidence of the explosive thermate, which can melt steel.

This evidence all indicates that the destruction of WTC was a pre-planned INSIDE JOB by elements inside our government. 'WTC,' the film ends by stating: "This must be avenged... if only we are brave enough to do so." Are you brave enough to bring the true perpetrators of 9/11 to justice?

Yeah. Im going to see the movie out of rememberance of the tragic event even though I do beleive it a little to early to be making a movie of this when it still fresh in peoples mind. But it always good to see it from another prespective and some good info all gathered up at once.

yup...going at 9 o clock tonight...cant wait

Mhm...google these points, and five bucks says you'll find a legitimate counterargument...that's what pisses me off about creationists who use outdated "facts" and things, that they could easily avoid being wrong about by googling.