Scientists Find Bones Of 3.3 Million Yr. Old Girl.....CRRAZY..
 

yup...popped up on yahoo...and i had to read it.....

now dont get me wrong..i am a believer in god....BUT..after u read this....tell me if they arent trying to suggest that darwins theory may have some truth behind it.....they dont flat out say it...but it comes across that way to me.....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060920...iopia_fossil_dc


it makes u think anyways

Heard all about this yesterday..

Cool shit huh.

yea pretty crazy....it was definitely a good read anyways

shit, i wish i could climb trees n shit. sho would help when u runnin frum tha pinche hurra -_- werd

3.3 million years ago, Holy fuck now that is a long ass time folks

hold up.....aint that how old dinosaurs are or sumthin??

Dinosaurs are a lot older...

..damn...3.3 million years is a LONG ASS TIME

and im sure theres older remains somewhere knowin that this baby didnt pop up outta no where

shits is rediculous they can come up wit all that just from a little girls bones... i dont know if i can believe all what they say with their "The fingers are long and curved which suggest she might have been able to swing through trees." so called suggestions

why not ^ thats completely believeable. It makes sense to me.

see, black ppl was are the original species.

if you believe in God... then you know.... the world is not Millions of years old... its only around 6 thousand or so years old....

if you believe we came from Monkeys.... then seriously... what is the reason to live....

i aint no GOT DAMN MONKEY.... i know who my ancestors were.... and its sad to see that humanity has gone this far south with their faith in GOD.... We were created in his IMAGE.... and GOD AINT NO DAMN MONKEY!!!!!!!!!


WERD

this is old........

if its the lucy i read about....witch its the same story.....and from what i understand, it was decided that the scull and body were from 2 different sources,,,,a monkey and a human......

they say they found bones 3.2-million-year-old in 1974, now these bones are 15000 years older.

OK, I can draw a line between, that, when we talking age, and especially that far back, the diffrence between those two bones would be like drawing two lines on a ants back and claiming ones longer.


I gotta call bullshit on this. Unless I see solid facts in my hands, Im not going to straight away beleive this.

How do they even determine that age of a bone? Obviously do test's, but how fucking accurate can a test of age be?!

Radio carbon dating gets it within 100 years I think?