RapVerse.com Community - View Single Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlcaTrakz

^ok there, break me in half over the internet mr big mbad moderator.

The complex issues it woudl raise? What about the first amendment? Does banning gays from marrying not go AGAINST that?

but yeah your right, maybe we need to add some more amendments because the bill of rights and constitution dopes not apply to all...sorta like how we actually had to ammend it to include blacks...and then ammend it to include women, because the term ALL PEOPLE did not include them...as it does not include gays right now.

but go ahead and decimate me mr politician, your the man.

dont be mad cause history is repeating itself and we are once again realizing that we have left certain people out of our "freedom to do as you wish" documents. It happens, thats why we make those unecessary amendments such as #15 which was unecesary to begin with.

But thats the GREAT OL usa for ya

decimate away

I hope your not taking this as hate or beef, I was just commenting on the fact that thease kids are calling me stupid when I was trying to add some calrity to the issue. That was not directly aimed at you alk... As I mentined in the thread prioviously, I do understand the need for gays to have the benifits that married couple do. My entire point is that, we as a country do not bend for those activist that disagree with the current defineition of marriage. It would not be fair the the mass majority that are against any latering of the constitution. Especially by those small numbers who want it changed. Let's speak pure fact for the moment. Fact one, America has an overwhelming majority agaisnt the changing of the constitution as it defines marriage now. Fact two, if the majority of americans felt this was the right thing to do, then it would be addressed. Yet this is not the case. End of arguement, and feeble attempts to challange my statements. I made them based on fact not presumption and emotion. Basically it would be a crime for some 12 activist judges to hold the American peoples constitution hostage. It would be a siege on everything this country stands for and built on. So Alk, can you not admit this? Is this not a fact? Of course it is, never did the founding fathers mean for the majority to be over ruled by the agenda of a few. As marriage is defined today, protects us from certain social and econimcs problems that can and will result from redefineing the institution of marriage. Could you not see that in my post?