RapVerse.com Community - View Single Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~LyRiCaL-JeZuS~

The official reports state that the 757 actually hit the ground near
a helipad before making any actual connection with the Pentagon.

But in this Clip that the camera caught their is no plane or anything
just an explosion. We would've seen if a plane skidded right into the wall.

Theory - The Pentagon attack was the result of a bomb?
Reports have also surfaced that there was a truck filled with
explosives parked near the Pentagon. Could this have been planted
there on purpose or was it just a maintenance truck? This has
been done before in many other "terrorist attacks" such as the
Oaklahoma City Bombing and the WTC explosion back in 1993.
These photographs will raise many questions of the 9/11 events.

I found this intresting and if its tru and the video proves it pretty
much, then why did they lie and say it was another plane. Another
thing I herd is of the few witnesses that were there they all said
no plane but that was taken off air after the first day when it
happend. Weird.

I toured that facitly after the attacks, before I was deployed. The wreckage was there still, and the area had a huge gouge directly infront of the building where the plane made contact then impact. I seen the fusilage and remnents of it, as well as lost coworkes in that attack. So don't make less of something you have absolutly no insight on. I understand how everyone is drawn to conspiracy theories, as I myself have contemplated many. This is just in very poor taste, people died on the flight and in the building, some of those were my firens and co workers. Just as in the towers we lost an entire floor of co workers friends in that building as well. I have lost co workers in the field durring deployment exercises, good people who put thier life in harms way for the good of the homeland. None of which were active military, but dedicaded profesionals working to ensure our troops and citizens have the best technical advantages possible in time of conflict. I am sure not a one would appreciate you reducing thier efforts down to unfounded assine theories of conspiracy.

Just as in your last post about the Presidents comments during the first moments of the attack. He was quoted as saying I seen a plane hit the tower.... In Texas twang the emphasis placed on the word 'Had' is very suttle and light, so it was not picked up in the transcript. All of a sudden it's a conspiracy that the President claim to have seen the plane hit prior to the footage. His next statement was -It must've been a terrible accidnet. If you look into the context of his words it is easy to see the President was simply stating that he had seen the plane Had hit the tower (not as it hit) then fortified by the next statement 'Must have' been a terrible mistake (implying action of the past as reported by the news) not meant to mean he seen it, as it hit. If so you are just pandering to the left's convaluted interpitation of fact. One more thing, do you realy think that the media feed is the only video evedence of the attack? If so you are further behind than I originally thought. That building was under constant survallence, from several 'tiers'. Again public knowledge, so much of the circumstance surrounding the attack made the media, and other components did not. Yet they exsist none the less.