Thread: Gay marriages
View Single Post
Old 01-23-04, 12:21 AM   #13
Phoeniix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
IP:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncedoggydog
I think you missed the point there. It's not so much the idea of gays getting married, but changing the constitutional definition of marriege it'self, that worries me and those like bush. Never should the views of so little dictate and or manipulate the laws put into place by the majority. I think we should stick with the majority, and the majority in this country do not want the definiton of marriage to be changed by activist judges. I mean thnk about the repercussions this will have on our way of life and society. One who's to say that if a male or female couple is able to reep the benifits of a married couple(man and woman) then who to say that a man and his girl (not married) shouldn't? Not only does that open several gray area's as this. It also undermines the institution of mariage. Don't get me wrong, Im not against gay couples being able to share benifits and live together as a couple. I just do not see any reason what so ever to change the definiton of marriege from a man and a women, to that of any combination you can think of. Where is it going to stop, these grey areas, are going to become very troublesome. Who's to say (if the current definition is changed) that a man and a boy can't get married. The laws were drafted ariound the definiton of marriege in our constitution. They were purposely written in a way to protect society from these tyoes of abominations. Pediophiles would be next in line to alter the text, and what about paligamy? Shit would be crazy, people woulld no longer have any marital bounderies, people would be paried uo with sheep walking down the isle just to reep the benifits. Which in turn would devistate this countries economy and social morality. I for one stand behind the president on this isue, and if you do not see the logic there, then hit me up and we can disscuss this indepth. Why can't gay couples live together and our governemnt offer them protection and benifits wthout changing the defiinitons. That is what Bush was syaing, so I do not understand those that talk out thier ass about the situation. You need to look deeper into the issue. I am an active politician and this has ben a pressing issue with me. I hope you can understand my jibberish, I typed it fast and did not spell check.


bounce, what do you care if the definition of marriage is changed? its not leading to chaotic pedephile incestual marriage or anything like that. its a step towards liberation and equal rights for all people.

when we abolished slavery, people must of been scared...oh no...blacks will break out and the n****** will fuck up our country..bla bla bla.

its all called progression

our consitution has formed in a way to be able to change with the times. as generations pass the interpretation of our laws and constitution shifts to appease new ideas.

today, homosexuality is becoming more of an open concept. legalizing gay marriage would only be a step in the right direction towards equal rights.

the whole "if we do this..what will come next!!" excuse is rationalist unrealistic bullshit justification that your mind creates to make sure you dont realize..."oh shit i might be prejudice or ignorant." legalizing gay marriage is not a step towards anything immoral or disgusting. how can 2 ppl of the same sex marrying compare to a brother and sister marrying any more than a heterosexual man and a heterosexual woman marrying. we are all just humans. we have laws against incest....pedephiles....and other immoral behavior. but as the times are a changing.....people are begginning to realize.....(slowly but surely, according to some of these posts)... that homosexuality does not rank with incest and pedliphilia and fucked up shit like that. it is okay! dont trip about it, it does not effect you at all.

what is marriage anyways, man?? its a bond of financial bullshit! thats all it is. our government does not take a role in major because of love or religion or anyting like that. marriage is a legal issue because it involves money: merging of income...trusts...inheritance...all economic financial bullshit. i could give a fuck about what marriage has to do with love and the fucking bible on a political level...our government shouldnt either..especially our president.
  Reply With Quote