Guest
|
IP:
Lethargic: I've skim read some of your posts.
Do you think the social structure is there to support these people if they don't have abortions? And/or the overall state-economic structure?
Are we are that stage of evolution where we can take substantial responsibility for such actions? You know, with this relatively free will we now have.
I guesss it's about valuation. How does one value one thing over the other. Career/partying/money over raising child/giving birth. I guess this relates to social/state structure n whatnot. As well as the evolution of the mind. And the overall mental capacity of that individual (not all are strong enough...or at least do not believe they are strong enough. And for them to realise that strength could take a lot).
I see it as the line theory. Many of the lines are uneven. Very few connect or on the same level. So until they come closer together. Or actually 'connect' or are on the same level, you'll get things like this.
Which can be strived towards using such things as improved awarness (both pre-sex and when in pregnant), better society...
I most definetly understand and appreciate your point of view. I agree with alot of it. But it's about the 'human' element. The social element. Which must be looked at before placing the 'nobility' of responsibility of such things onto it.
The methods to do so are arguable. But to impose it in this day and age could be a mistake.
Just a quick rundown of sorts. Feel free to pick it off.
|