Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul-Full
^wait IM GOING OFF on a tangent?
|
And I'm your partner in this dismal fandango of pointlessness. See how far your stupidity can take you?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul-Full
LMFAO
|
OMFG!!111!!!!!!1 LOLOLOLOLOP PWN3D111111!!11 UB4R 1337 HAX0R!!11111
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul-Full
ok.
dog, your talking abotu stimuli and all this other bullshit. ALL WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS AN AWARD SHOW ANY WHY CERTAIN PEOPLE WIN.
|
Awww, can't your brain handle a related concept which you, either knowingly or not, led to? Playing the Devil's Advocate is all very well, but try to win next time. And on the contrary, you're talking about, and I quote "what is best".
Here's a familiar post:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul-Full
"Ummmm...So what is best? what MAD MAN belives is best....right? WHAT are you supposed to base the award on then? What 5 backpackers believe is the best? What a rap board believes is the best? A vote...oh no wait, the vote would probably end up being a popularity contest just like record sales. So where would you set YOUR basis for giving out awards? As sad as it is, this is the reason why nelly was winning alot of awards, as is the case with 50 now.
THATS the only way you CAN base an award system. Whoever sells teh most, IN THE PUBLICS eye, is obviosully "the best"
think about it. No i dont agree that 50 should be getting all these awards, but the PUBLIC does. and thats how it works. NOt what the 2% backpacker community feels is the illest lyrisist."
|
Majorities do not define. Therefore "Whoever sells teh most, IN THE PUBLICS eye, is obviosully "the best"" is obviously erroneous, and therefore the award system is called into question. You are STATING why people are winning awards. You are DEBATING the manner upon which this is decided. Get a clue, you retard.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul-Full
so take the book smarts, shove them up your ass, and let me know how you feel in the morning.
1
|
Can you feel the maturity? Dumb motherfucker...