|
Banned: Cheating
|
IP:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raptor
Ultimately it doesnt matter, cuz the "ELECTORAL COLLEGE" DECIDES WHO THE PRESIDENT IS NOT "WE THE PEOPLE". But if I did vote, I'd go wit Bush for the following reasons:
1) Bush is ALL BALLS(ACTION) and NO BRAINS( HE LACKS THE ABILITY TO FORESEE THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTIONS). But at least he has a plan unlike Kerry. He's graspin at straws-and doesnt appear to have a substantive and or 'real' plan 4 our nations welfare, concerning things foreign (international) or domestic( within our nation.)
2) The 2nd reason is, "WHY START OVER"? I MEAN BUSH JUST GOT HIS LEGS UNDERNEATH HIM, SO WHY PUT 'NO-PLAN HAVIN KERRY' IN? SEE KERRY WILL HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING BUSH DID, ALL OVER AGAIN AND WHILE HE'S PLAYIN CATCHUP SEPT 12TH , 13TH, 14TH , ETC COULD HAPPEN.
NUFF SED
|
eh thats the problem with bush , he is NO BRAINS, and if anyone starts spitt'n anything about yale i swear, but yea man is retarded, and thats what makes him so dangerous he dosent think of what his actions can lead to, which is important in this day and age , because you fuck up on that grand of a scale(he already has) then nothing good can come from it, i think it will be a slow start with kerry but you forget he does have war experience ... like he was a real soldier, not jus a rich boy doing jack shit, but he will be an advantage to himself, a new plan of attack would help raise moral , and give a lil bit to the economy, right now all bush has done is cause more problems, with our allies, and enemies(i dont care if he captured saddam , its osama and the rest of his friends i would like to see)
o yea we need a good leader , anyone but bush  |