Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raptor
fuxjus I feel what u sed, but try to see things practically. Your boy Kerry doesnt have a clue (a real plan). HELL if he did, I'd probably be inclined to vote 4 him, so long as-unlike Bush-he demonstrated to me that he has foresight in his decision making( which currently he does not, that's why he constantly contradicts himself.)
Oh P.S. That stat on Civil War dead was probably inaccurate if u did'nt first subtract the CONFEDERATE DEAD, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT AMERICANS. FUKKN TREASONOUS 'SESH' BASTARDS. aiight, anyway 1
|
Im feelin wat raptor is sayin......... hes esplainin himself alot better then sumother people up on this site........... and i admit that my faith in Kerry has been droppin cuz he seems to have no plan to wat to do with the Iraq War. Bush hasnt talked about it that much either lately, but we all know where he stands...... a couple points tho
1. how many times am i gonna have to say the reason kerry voted not to give MORE money for the troops and shit is because it had been along time and they found no weapons (or sadaam at that point) so he wanted them out of there.
2. yea i put confederates in....... but it still prolly be more with just union
3. ohhh one little fact. Even tho North Korea has nukes and Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction, neither of them could travel all the way from even the edge of Europe to the Coast of the US......... and second off. we have huge military intelligence technology today that could detect these missiles from far away and could blow them to pieces with no harm done to the Us if the missiles magically could reach.......... i think there was even a report that North Koreas missiles could only land in countries in some countries in Europe at the most.
4. other point was too long, so i forgot this one.