Quote:
|
Originally Posted by B-MAC
No.. Your Wrong.. That might be the standing Definition in or W/e in the Websters Dictionary. Or the First Result from a Google Search, But They were using that word back in the day and that's what it standed for, Now maybe as the years went on and Dictionary's were re-Wrote, the Definition changed. But Little man, I'm sorry thats where it did Derive from.. So Eat..
|
Alright, try to comprehend the knowledge I'm about to drop on you to disable any chance that "Fornification Under the King's Consent" could have started "fuck."
Just take a second to think about the follwing;
If the King had to approve people having sex there would be NO time to do anything else. If it was his responsibilty to give OK to every couple who wants to have sex, that would literally take ALL day. A King's job is to run a country. There would be no time to approve people who want to have sex.
Also, "Fornification Under the King's Consent" doesn't even make sense when compared to what "fuck" means.
You're making an assumption that Fornification's orgin means having sex, period. When in fact, the origin of fornification can mean having sex premaritly or extramaritly, but not between a wedded couple. Therefore, wedded couples could not ask permission to have sex under "Fornification."
Now, shut the fuck up. I just crashed down your whole idea.