Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doomsday
Bro, you sound liek a hallocinigenic crack fiend right now. Here goes again, so you do exactly what you accused me of doing:
1: You just repeated exactly what I said and jsut used different examples - then asked me if I was sure air exists, when I jsut told you I know it does. What's the sense in that? I also told you how to verify for your self the existance of air. Your pointless counter-argument of "maybe its' something else" is completely wasted since it has absolutely no facts or any discussble truths to it. You raise aboslutely no points that would indicate that it DOSEN'T exist - which I did when shitting all over your "ghost" argument. the only thing you've said is "maybe" as if you were gonna put doubt in me, lol. No son, once agian, I am sure air exists and I already told you how I am sure of it. And how you cna see it for your self any time you'd like. You'd also have a point if things like Boyles law an the inert gas law and principles on thermal dynamics, and the princilples of wind resistance, and basic ass shit liek a map sensor or air pressure gauge didn't exist in addition to various other air/heat formulae - which are all proven far beyond your "maybe".
Your whole job at this point, since you tlaked your self into a corner, is to prove that air DOSEN'T exist, since I have already proven that it does. Not to mention the netire science comminuty that you live and breath from. Go!
2: I already discredited word of mouth in my ON argument and, once again, told you how YOU for your SELF could verify the existance of south africa your self. why would I prove it to you whne I showed you how to prove it to your self? You're going nowhere with this.
PS, "holograms" are real. A hologram is light projected to form an illusion. Now your'e going to tell me that light isn't real...
|
ahhhhh...but here's the problem with your "arguments"
#1...Boyles Laws...laws of inert gases and anything regarding AIR is a moot point...you can apply a law to anything you choose to apply it to...My argument is that Boyles Laws applies to "somthing" that has been experienced that you all call AIR...But, can you prove that "air" exists? No one can truly see air. You can not see atoms. Therefore, you don't know it exists. All you know exists is something that exibits some characteritics of matter that people have arbitrarily decided to call "air"...If you correlate this to ghosts, then I can argue that at least people have claimed to "see" them...People have "felt" it...and people use various meters and monitors to measure paranormal--read: energy--activity...So, air only exists by definition only...A paranormal psychologist has every right to claim ghosts exists based on YOUR argument...that they've SEEN IT...that they have instruments that MEASURE it...that they see evidence of it's PRESENCE...
#2...You missed my point on this one...Word of mouth isn't what I was discrediting...I'm saying that even if I go to South Africa, that doesn't Prove it exists...that only proves that I experience "something" that has been called "South Africa"...If JOHN DOE has never been outside of bumfuck Lousiana and believes me, then he is dumb. If he travels to South Africa, then he can make the argument that it exists...But, that doesn't PROVE it exists...Therefore, how can you say people who claim to have "experienced" ghosts are vaild?...If that's the case, then I can say people who "claim" to have seen or been to South Africa are invalid and are suffering from some induced hysteria...
The facts are evident: people experience many things that they interpret in different ways...U can always define laws to validate a point you're trying to prove...Im just saying DON'T discredit someone who's experienced something that you haven't had the opportunity to yet...for what it's worth...which is all
JUST
RELATIVE.
thank you very much
