ahhhhh...but here's the problem with your "arguments"
#1...Boyles Laws...laws of inert gases and anything regarding AIR is a moot point...you can apply a law to anything you choose to apply it to...My argument is that Boyles Laws applies to "somthing" that has been experienced that you all call AIR...But, can you prove that "air" exists? No one can truly see air. You can not see atoms. Therefore, you don't know it exists. All you know exists is something that exibits some characteritics of matter that people have arbitrarily decided to call "air"...If you correlate this to ghosts, then I can argue that at least people have claimed to "see" them...People have "felt" it...and people use various meters and monitors to measure paranormal--read: energy--activity...So, air only exists by definition only...A paranormal psychologist has every right to claim ghosts exists based on YOUR argument...that they've SEEN IT...that they have instruments that MEASURE it...that they see evidence of it's PRESENCE...
#2...You missed my point on this one...Word of mouth isn't what I was discrediting...I'm saying that even if I go to South Africa, that doesn't Prove it exists...that only proves that I experience "something" that has been called "South Africa"...If JOHN DOE has never been outside of bumfuck Lousiana and believes me, then he is dumb. If he travels to South Africa, then he can make the argument that it exists...But, that doesn't PROVE it exists...Therefore, how can you say people who claim to have "experienced" ghosts are vaild?...If that's the case, then I can say people who "claim" to have seen or been to South Africa are invalid and are suffering from some induced hysteria...
The facts are evident: people experience many things that they interpret in different ways...U can always define laws to validate a point you're trying to prove...Im just saying DON'T discredit someone who's experienced something that you haven't had the opportunity to yet...for what it's worth...which is all
JUST
RELATIVE.
thank you very much
