Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doomsday
WHAT?!?!!? man thats impossible. Inertia alone would jsut have one wave, not numerous ones. Nothing on a planet is perpetual thanks to gravity.
And how do you contest the numerous conflicting light sources in the photos, misplaced cross-hairs, and lack of indentation where the LEM supposedly landed??
|
if u look at a wave flap, there is DEF. contact between the flag and the pole...that contact could create jus the right amt. of force through inertia to keep a flag "waving"...and since gravity is less of a factor, it would be possible. On earth, wind creates that effect. Though, there is no wind on the Moon. Why else wouldn't a flag keep moving on earth if you wave it? It's because gravity would pull downward on it and eventually stop it.
and as far as light goes, u have to realize that the space craft itself probably had light sources on it...Just because an article written by a conspiracy theorist said it didn't doesn't make it true.
Fact is, going to the moon is quite feasible and I believe more evidence exists to suggest they did it than not.
Oh...and for the people who argue that we didn't land on the moon because of the lack of a dust plume...Well...here's that Explanation.
ON earth, dust plums created by thrusters kick up dust because of the Air between the rocket and the ground...In other words, as the fuel jettisons from the rocket, it pushes downward on the air in between the thruster and the ground. On the moon, there is no AIR. So, as the gas jettisons out the thruster, it DOES NOT create a dust plume.
WE went to the moon.
1