Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tha Q.
1st of all...all of these anti-moon visit theories are absurd conjectures due to inaccurate research...
the truth is this:
#1...The sun provides light...but the 2nd greatest light source is the moon itself...And when you mix in glare and bright white light due to various sources, including the moon's surface, you can get strange and unusual visual representations...that explains the crosshair "phenomenon"...the bright white objects bled into the surrounding areas and created that effect...
Also...Newton's 3rd law of motion says that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
A) THRUSTERS work in ZERO AIR...which means it doesn't require AIR to push on
That require 2 Surfaces for Newton's law to be true.
Now, what are those two surfaces? SIMPLE
The Craft is the 1st object and the gas from the thrusters is the 2nd object
when a craft is in Absolute space (vacuum) it can still move because the thrusters push against the craft and the craft against the thrusters...NO WALL or AIR aside from the gas from thrusters is necessary...that's how it works
WE WENT TO THE MOON.
And as far as technology goes, I don't know...I'm not a space engineer...but these issues we're talking about with air and inertia are basic physics
it's real simple...Craters won't be created without the force of AIR creating them...
that's why the apollo craft DIDN'T create one
1
|
1: Nope. Try agian. The moon reflects the sun's light so if anything it'd be an ambient light IF THAT while one were actually one it and it'd be coming form the surface itself. Not from a direct and focused secondary point. That dosent explain the crosshair phenominon at all seeing that the crosshair is BEHIND another image. All the light in the world wouldn't do that. Especially seeing that the object that broke the continuity isn't luminiscent in any way shape or form.
A: False again. First up, the craft landing on the moon would apply force against the craft AND the moon's surface. Not magically defy physics and only apply it to the craft. Secondly, thrusters (aka afterburners) ONLY work off air. Ever see a flame in space? Don't you need air (and fuel and spark) to have fire??? C'mon man, this is thirdgrade stuff. "Thrusters" as you keep callin it only works off the basic principals of air. And they're not called "thusters" they're called Afterburners. They're defined as this:
af·ter·burn·er Audio pronunciation of "afterburner" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ftr-bûrnr)
n.
1. A device for augmenting the thrust of a jet engine by burning additional fuel with the uncombined oxygen in the exhaust gases.
Wait.....did that just say oxygen??? damn....
You keep aying "we went to the moon" but haven't given a credible explaination yet. Sounds liek you dont' even know the fundamentals of a friggin fire.