Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tha Q.
I'm not going to argue simple science with someone who likes to disagree for the sake of disagreeing...
There is virtually NO AIR RESISTANCE in space...so thrusters work much easier in space than on earth...There are molecules in space...but that's negligible for what we're talking about...
and Cross haird behind an image COULD be created through bleeding intense light...research it duke.
I'm saying that you could have a rocket take off on the moon and not create this huge crater or dust plume...Quite possible again due to the fact--AGAIN--that a dust plume is created by the air in between the ship and the ground, which on the moon doesn't exist.
You're argument that we didn't go to the moon stems on a few photos that exibit unusual light representations?
that's ridiculous...cuz, weren't u the same person who said GHOSTS can't exist because of of natural phenomenon...
now...which is more logical? that we went to the moon and there were visual abnormalities due to various light sources, or that there is an international Hoax to make JFK look like a fuckin hero?
get da fuck outta here
|
I'm not even gonna argue your theory on afterburners since physics and Lockheed Martin mastered and owned you with that decades before you were even born. Go google for it. And theres no way in hell an object with 3000+lbs of thrust is not going to disturb the surface of a planet that's covered in dust.
As for this "moon landing", I'm looking at it from a point of reality. How'd the astronauts suvive the radiation? How the hell did their suits sustain against 250ºF+ heat (I dare you to say "air conditioners" again cuz you'll get pee'd on with your own argument)? How are these conflicting light sources adressed? Where's the stars? There's too many things suspect about something that should be so routine.
And yeah, I'm the same guy who said ghosts don't exsit. The common denominator in both these discussions is FACTS which in both cases they're are none. Just speculation and your wild-ass guesses and assumptions.
And who said jack shit about JFK? Why are you changing the subject?