Okay, Mysteri, I'm going to put this as simply as I possibly can.


If the debate one presents is correct and the other is proven incorrect, it doesn't matter if the other person is silent. If the person keeps presenting stupid facts, that doesn't mean that the debate continues, it means the person has been owned and is trying to not say the same thing. If you stay with your original statement after being owned, like you do, then you're just a fucking ignorant dumbass.

Kiddy terms:

if one person wins, it doesn't matter if the other person keeps talking, they've still lost.


What's hard to get, Chief, is that it doesn't matter in what area it's put in...in this case the definition is used in it's proper way, not in a narrowed down path. I never said I owned her lyrically, so it has nothing to do with something being lyrical.