Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ThatNigga
no the controllers pretty gay, and another thing about ps3 is i can use my psp as a controller, as for the revolution i hate its physical look, and the ps2 controller is gay to , and as for internal memory, the xbox is gonna have 100 gigs and over, even if ps3 had internal memory it doesent have THAT much, and because its made by microsoft will make the internet better, ive been on xbox live AND ps3 online, both broadban, xbox's connection was WAYY faster, also xbox graphics are wayyyy better, and it loads up wayyy faster, and its not provern but xbox 360 is rumored to have a cd/dvd burner, ps3=more games xbox 360=better everything else revoluton=not sure cuz the full specs havent been released yet, xbox xomes out next month and -s2 comes out next spring so they r bound to add more things, so im sure once it DOES come out itll be better than xbox
|
I can use my psp as a controller as well... But why would you want to? It has no R2 or L2, and no right analog stick. My guess is most games WONT support PSP use as a controller.. maybe as a remote controller for the menu or something but I dunno.
You can think what you want about the revolution, but the truth is that its the future of gaming. Next generation after this coming one, all consoles will use a controller that has a 3 dimensional range of movement. It just makes games so much easier.
Half of the 360s dont even have a hard drive... you have to pay extra. Its external memory since its removable. NOT internal. So basically it doesnt matter if its 20GB or a million GB because its REMOVABLE.
Same with PS3... on release, you could get a 20GB hard drive, a 60GB... 149GB.. whatever suits you. Your argument has no bearing, because as technology progresses we'll be seeing 500GB hard drives available for the ps3 and 360.
You dont know a lot about internet connections do you.. I might just steer clear of that for fear of boring people, but whether something is made by microsoft or not has absolutely nothing to do with how fast the connection is.
Where do you get your information from anyway? The PS3's graphics are better than Xbox360's... theres no argument about it. The PS3's specs are simply better... the reason why early games from ps3 and 360 might loko similar graphics wise, is because the PS3 is NEW TECHNOLOGY... no coder has experience in coding for 7 CPU cores, its hard as fuck. The xbox360 has 3... everyone knows how to code efficiently and use the hardwares full potential, because thats the same amount of cores they used LAST GENERATION.
and the 360 doesnt have "better everything else" ... They both have pretty much the same features. Except the maximum a dual layer DVD (360's game format) can hold is 4-9GB.
The PS3 uses blu-ray, (and its a cheap as fuck blu ray player too, considering blu ray disc players are like $3000 now) it can play blu-ray movies and games. A single layered blu ray disc holds 50GB ... which straight up owns DVD technology. But blu ray discs can have up to FOUR LAYERS. thats 200GB on a disc... more than most hard drives. Which just kills DVDs in every way. As well as the new coating they give to blu ray discs, that prevents scratches.
The facts are that the PS3 is better than the 360. Im not biased, I just base my shit off of facts. Whether the xbox will be more successful than the PS3, im not sure. It might because it comes out earlier and before christmas... microsoft are smart marketers.
I might not even get either of them, ill just wait to see how things play out. The one im definitely getting is the revolution... its lightyears ahead of xbox360 and ps3.