stem cell research is completely different with aborted fetuses, when a child is born, theres only like a 2% difference in dna(thats not exact, but close), so stem research with aborted fetuses can also help in the study of communicable diseases, the question of whats moral and whats not comes in when the idea of people selling there unborn child for the sake of research...thats the only problem people generally face with this issue....

personally this is what i think, i think abortion is wrong, but should be legal..because i believe in choice, it's what our country was supposed to be built on, anyways, i think stem cell research with aborted babies is fine, as long as theres no business. If science wants to take an aborted child, that would have been aborted without stem cell research in mind, i don't see a problem..however, it would be hard to impossible to regulate peoples intentions when getting an abortion, and being how is the government has ultimate power, theres no way we could be sure it was being regulated, regardless of what we were told.

__________________

Time is not long, and indecision is hells cemment. So the well is rented, untill heaven is relevant. Untill then, to be eloquent, sex cells, so le'ts cellibate.

"watch what you watchin...fox keeps feedin' us toxin's..stop sleepin' start thinkin outside of the box and unplug from the matrix doctrine....but watch what you say cause big brother is watchin" - nas - sly fox

The I.H.C.J.S.F.M.T.R.H.P.M.M.W.T.S.M.S.I.T.F.F.W.A.S. O Crew