Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nostradamus
How the hell can they get info from feb 06 when there was no census in feb 06?
Sure that page might have been updated in feb 06 with information about the race riots...
But there is no possible way they could have obtained any new information on that date about statistics of different color percentages..
Your arguments are dumb... Just face it and move on.. Theres no point arguign with you because your not being intelligent here.. Your just nit picking and pretending to be right.... I have no interest in discussing anything with you....
And the 'other' is torris straight islanders.. I knew other looked weird.. And then it clicked....
|
mmmmm NAH, Not buyin it. You're still duckin the issue. Here it is again
Now you got 2 questions to answer in this thread alone
The oldest source on that page is from feb 2006. It says so right in the "History" tab. Please learn to read.
1: Also, what happened to this "other" that you didn't even think existed, where'd that come from??? You swore that I made that up and I sure didn't. You swore that this info is old, and it ain't older thna feb 06.
2: Quote:
So
92% white
+7% asian and/or middle eastern
+1% Aboriginal/"other"
--------------------
= 100%
So the black people that you say is missing and unnacounted for from your national CENSCUS that "dosen't tell you everything" what percentage are they over this 100%? another 13%? 15%?
You can't even count man. First you deny that it says "and other" then you try to make up something for the same words you KNEW weren't there in the first place - and now you can't even count!!!!
Why do you bother? Do you hate your self?
Now you're saying I shouldn't believe the census and should believe you. And when you're pinpointed on a real issue, liek a complete lie, you call it "nitpicking" lmao.
And I still haven't seen where there's a a missing portion of this 100% for black people kid. You seem to conveniently forget!