Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LaTiNKiTTeN
lol@apexx PRETENDING he didnt read my post then QUOTING things i said at the end (mumbo jumbo)....c'mon son isnt that a little pathetic?
obviously u arent getting my point.
my point is,you are talking about something u CANT BE SURE OF,no matter how many books you read,because even the SCIENTISTS who performed such experiments are still calling it a HYPOTHESIS and not a fact. but u want to act like you KNOW exactly what happens when there is not ONE person in this world who KNOWS what exactly happens when we die. period. u can list a zillion books,and journals and other sources. but each one is just SOMEONE'S hypothesis. u can AGREE with them,or BELIEVE thats the truth,but believing something a hypothesis,and it actually being a FACT are two very different things.....
.....in simple terms,HOW exactly do u intend to PROVE what happens to ppl when they die? there is NO SUCH experiment that can be conducted that can determine that and call it a FACT. the results can only be called a hypothesis.....stop talking on the subject because we'll just be back to square one,u trying to prove something u CAN NOT POSSIBLY prove.
goodbye...again lol
|
That's odd. didn't I say I read it and made it through the first half, skimmed the rest and saw your whole post was an attack? REAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The experiemnt wasn't a hypothesis lmao. AHAHAAHHAHA. An experiment would be the exact opposite of a hypothesis, BUT he hypothisized about what it is that might be leaving the body. What he DOES know is that it's etheric. what he dosen't know is if it has a conciousness. REAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
You think he's the only person to do this experiment? I coulda swore I said he wasn't. Maybe you "conveniently" ignored that part and hoped I'd forget. RRRREAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!! <----wow, I seem to be repeating my self quite a bit.
I see your only "point" (though dull) is "you can't prove that! it's IMPOSSIBLE for you to prove that!!"
In your mind, it's already impossible that wht you consider is "unexplainable" could actually be explained. In my mind, nothing is unexplainable and there's no such thing as a "mystery" - there's an answer for everything since everything happens for a reason. I guess you were right, I really must be uneducated, because I don't know the meaning of the word "impossible". Everything's impossible till somebody does it.
Oh yeah, when faced with facts, people who want to hold onto anything they believe (such as your self) always run to the "hey, you can't prove that! you can't prove anything!" argument. Next you're gonna say "you can't even prove we exist".
BTW, a "human being" is a physical body, and contrary to your statement, everyone knows what happens to a "human being" after it dies. It decomposes and rots.... sooooo.........what on earth are you talking about??