Originally Posted by Tha Q.

P.S. Here's an example of how Apexx argues to ensure he "wins" arguments, even when he is blatantly wrong on some issues.


Apexx says:

This ball to my left is red. Therefore, if this ball to my left is red, then this box to my right is blue.

Someone he's debating with says:
NO. That box on your right is YELLOW.

Apexx says:

NO. You're wrong. The box on the right is blue because the ball on the LEFT is red.

Person says: I don't see the ball on the left as red.


Apexx says: If you don't see the ball on the left as red, then your claim that the box on the right is yellow is WRONG.


^^Setting the rules to his own arguments means I'd have to agree with his points or lose that argument by default.

Clever...but NONSENSE.