View Single Post
Old 04-03-06, 07:10 PM   #7
Tha Q.
OYD
 
Tha Q.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 10,036
IP:

OK...Pimp'n...You're not understanding what ELS is, or why it's a statistical impossibility for Moses and other prophets to have encoded the bible themselves.

Check this out:

You're looking at this one dimensionally. In other words, you're viewing these codes as one-line or one-word messages that are embedded at set intervals. This is only somewhat true. Here is what is the actual case:

The codes are found in equi-distant spacing throughout a text. IN other words, they'll start at one point and count over the same amount of letters, over and over until a word or phrase is found. Get this! Let's say the distance between letters is 365 characters. After running ELS with that spacing, they find a message. That's ONLY ONE MESSAGE! Then, in the SAME PASSAGE, they can count only 65 letters and get a separate message. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT intersecting the text they can count 4000 characters and get yet another message. That is IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to do. You're suggesting that Moses can write stories in the bible that make sense. Then, embed hidden messages that intersect like a matrix beneath the surface scripture? NOT ONLY THAT, but the messages are often prophetic and include dates!


Bro...ELS has only verified what we believers already knew, and that's the bible was divinely inspired by God. This technique is run on the ancient Hebrew and not the Enligh versions. Some skeptics argue that words don't translate. That is not fully the truth. Words do translate from Hebrew to English. There are only some examples when Hebrew words don't FULLY translate into English. So, if they discover the name "HITLER" in the Hebrew using ELS, then it translates HITLER.



1
Send a message via AIM to Tha Q.   Reply With Quote