Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 9th
Clinton was in office as the US President when Pac was killed in 1996. Clinton wouldn't have let the government kill him.
|
Public image and political motive are two compleatly different things.
Look at pac's life..
- Strong ties with the panthers. (blood)
- Started a movement called "Thuglife" which aimed to compleatly legitimise and promote gangs.
- Had music that promoted gangs and violence.
- Very publically spoke out against the government in songs and speech and to his credit.. He did it a hell of a lot better than your average shit for brains activist.
And I could go on. But the underlying point is, whether or not agencies such as the FBI had anything to do with his death or the coverup that followed. They sure as fuck had motive.
People say suge did it over un-paid royalties. Except this comes into conflict with two major points.
1) Suge put himself right in the shooters line of fire. And he is a big mother fucker = hard to miss. (And the fact he didnt get directly hit has professional shooter written all over it mind you).
2) Tupac had a lot of music left in him. Unless he was talking of leaving deathrow for another independant release like Me against the world, suge would have to be a retard to actually want to kill off his main artist, its like a sports agent breaking both legs of his best client... Seriously...
My state of mind stands that I dont know who killed Tupac. All I know is who had motive and the means to pull it off.
FBI seems a little more feasable than suger...
