View Single Post
Old 07-18-06, 10:01 AM   #54
King Solo
Skadoosh!
 
King Solo's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,012
IP:

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hensley.
yeah, but the difference was that there were about 5 people that week who DID get wins and they didn't vote when their opponent no showed. he said he fucked me over because i didnt vote the weeks before that, which i totally think is wrong.

i dont think kemp is biased, but i also don't agree with his call on that one. when a person no shows the battle should be over, right then and there. and i shouldnt have been punished for my past faults later on, i should have just lost the battles the weeks i didnt vote instead of him holding off until later.

basically if other people get away with something one week, and one other person doesnt then it's NOT fair, regardless of what happened in previous weeks. that should have been dealt with in the previous weeks.



Valid opinion. I think the way Kempo was doing it was that he was giving you the opportunity to start voting and when you didn't after like the 3rd week he just thought fuck it, and did you over.

But, if you think about it and you say that he should've just gave you losses for the previous weeks where you didn't vote... you would've never been in the Championship Match then in the first place.

I would be cool with it though, because it would overturn the win you got over me.
__________________
Send a message via AIM to King Solo Send a message via MSN to King Solo   Reply With Quote