|
Just searching.
|
IP:
Quote:
|
ok name a steel frame buiding the size of the WTC that fell from fire in a few hours.........
|
I can't, because not many buildings the size of the WTC have been hit with airplanes. There probably are more or less some, and even the ones who did have internal fires but did not collapse still had different factors to be added.
Quote:
|
and loose change isnt the only say in the issue of 9/11theres so much more than that, thats just a video thats helping to make people consider the possibilty. but back to the buildings and fires many many witnesses heard explosions well after the fires had died down, coming from the lower levels, no where near the initial point of impact
|
Uhm...there are other things that explode than a building itself...transformers, generators, whatever. Well after the fires had died down? Why would they set off bombs after the fires have died down?
Quote:
even news anchors 1st thought when the towers went down was that it was similar to a controlled demolition
peep
http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/sep...ddemolition.htm
in their own words, supported by video evidence
everybodies 1st thought was a demolition not some bullshit pancake theory
|
Yeah bro, because a lot of people know the difference between a demolition and a building collapsing because of a plane crashing into it. SIMILIAR to a demolition; yeah, it would be similiar to a demolition because in both times, two buildings explode and crumple to the ground. You're honestly going to tell me that these people, who are spiked full of adrenaline and fear after seeing a great National Landmark collapse, are going to be able to logically differentiate a building collapsing via airplane (which I somehow doubt they have seen before) and a demolition (which probably less than 4% have witnessed).
Quote:
if the structure sagged and the building collapsed floor by floor due to the fire, it wouldve took longer to fall, it took 10 seconds for the north tower to fall completely on its on blueprint, 10 seconds for a buiding with plus 100 floors to collapse......how can this be w/o it being a controlled demolition? tell me
ok name a steel frame buiding the size of the WTC that fell from fire in a few hours.........and loose change isnt the only say in the issue of 9/11theres so much more than that, thats just a video thats helping to make people consider the possibilty. but back to the buildings and fires many many witnesses heard explosions well after the fires had died down, coming from the lower levels, no where near the initial point of impact
|
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Quote:
even news anchors 1st thought when the towers went down was that it was similar to a controlled demolition
peep
http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/sep...ddemolition.htm
in their own words, supported by video evidence
everybodies 1st thought was a demolition not some bullshit pancake theory
if the structure sagged and the building collapsed floor by floor due to the fire, it wouldve took longer to fall, it took 10 seconds for the north tower to fall completely on its on blueprint, 10 seconds for a buiding with plus 100 floors to collapse......how can this be w/o it being a controlled demolition? tell me
|
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
That'll have all that good old factual information going against what you say, and probably all of your other points as well. So, you're telling me, the government with its nearly unlimited power within its own country, would not have the intelligence to be able not let all of their shit to contradict itself? I doubt someone spontaneously announced, "LET'S BOMB OUR SHIT", and then they did no calculations. If they had set up bombs, they probably would've known the fact that, uh, I don't know, the majority of America would see what happened?
Quote:
also in photos you'll see massive steel beams,as each tower collapsed you'll see these beams ejected UPWARDS as the buildings fell, can a fire also cause these massive steel beams to go UP, while everything else fell on its self?
or is it more likely that explosives inside played a part?
and how would the you explain WTC 7 falling a few hours later with NO fires burning with in it?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm
peep this if you still believe the fire theory
|
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
There you are. |