Quote:
|
and when you concider that security in the building was lowered beyond beleife, sniffer dogs(for explosives) were removed so on n so forth, not far from the day it happened in the twin towers... guess who was the only person with the power to do that??? george bush's brother. again i checked up on that, and its true... there are several places around the pentagon with cctv facing the direction of the pentagon, the fbi confiscated all of them, and only one was released from the pentagon grounds(all of 5 frames) looks NOTHING like a plane hitting it(looks way too small and explodes nothing like a plane would).
|
Never noticed that.
1. The frames don't take into account the speed of the plane and whatnot. I'm thinking that the frames themselves are too primitive to capture the sight of a 500+ mph plane in 5 frames. You might see a blur.
2. Of course you're going to confiscate the tapes, it's called evidence. Not evidence to conspiracy theory, evidence that should be reviewed so that an official report could be filed. It's quite obvious they'd want all the information they could get.
3. The security wasn't lowered beyond belief. Actually, a bomb threat was called in and dogs were brought in. They didn't detect any thousands of pounds of bombs inside of the building, and thus were removed. Tell me, do you think there was enough of a period for "them" to secretly implant the necessary bombs, seal up all evidence, and move out? That's really stretching it.
I can understand where you're coming from, but there are explanations. It may seem shady they're confiscating tapes, but there is a legitimate explanation to that (even though it may not be true, and they were actually disposing of incriminating evidence). But tell me, does it make any fucking sense they're going to have eye witnesses that see it? Why would they fabricate the lie of a plane crashing into it? Why not hi-jack one of their own planes and crash it into the building, instead of going through the rigorous, unrewarding process of emptying the building of all its employees and systematically inserting explosives? And by the way, the entire destruction of the WTC resembles a demolition in pretty much no way. Even if the Towers didn't come down, they'd be killing less of their employees while still having the justification of a terrorist attack. They made sure to kill about 99.9% of their employees by planting bombs, when they could've simply built off the original story and crashed their own planes?
Not buying it.