Originally Posted by Crazy Hades

Tell me why they would use bombs. Which would contradict the story. Why could the US have not hijacked their own planes and still crashed them, thus having eye witness accounts of an actual plane crashing into the tower and even if the towers do not pancake, then it would still kill many and be perceived as a terrorist threat. While still having a higher percent of their own trained employees who survived.

Why the fuck would they use a controlled demolition? I could accept, Bush had the hijackers hijack the plane and crash them, MAYBE, but faking the existence of planes crashing into buildings in the first place to conceal a controlled demolition?

There is seriously no logic at all in that theory.