Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Crazy Hades
Tell me why they would use bombs. Which would contradict the story. Why could the US have not hijacked their own planes and still crashed them, thus having eye witness accounts of an actual plane crashing into the tower and even if the towers do not pancake, then it would still kill many and be perceived as a terrorist threat. While still having a higher percent of their own trained employees who survived.
Why the fuck would they use a controlled demolition? I could accept, Bush had the hijackers hijack the plane and crash them, MAYBE, but faking the existence of planes crashing into buildings in the first place to conceal a controlled demolition?
There is seriously no logic at all in that theory.
|
because an aluminum can called a plane won't rock a steel building, and jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. hell the most fragile part of the plane (the wings) would have broken clear off before it would have penetrated the building. so you gotta do something to take down the buildings - or else how the hell are you gonna get an entire country that hates you all behind you?! how else is you and your VP gonna make billions upon billions for you and your campaign financers if you cant' get oil and sell weapons that your company makes? how you gonna make billions off of "rebuilding" a country they you destroyed with your own company (haliburton) if you didn't??
common sense b. the real question is "why wouldn't they". shortly after both the towers went down, there was lots of talk in the news from achetectual engineers stating "there must have been explosives invovled because jet fuel alone is not hot enough". now, magically, the media (aka the 4th branch of government) doesn't give that evidence any any airtime at all.
...what a surprise.
they said arab hijackers took the planes, yet the flight records on ALL 4 planes that day (yes, i said 4) don't show not one single middle eastern name, yet the media isn't giving that any air time either.
...what a surprise.
bush and his butt buddies said they observed mohamad attah meeting with bin laden to plan all this out - yet the day they claim they witnessed this meeting, officials in a country thousands of miles away show mohamad in their custody the entire time. hmm...this isn't being discussed either
...what a surprise.
the list of evidence to show they're full of shit is a mile long man.
Hitler burned the Reistagg and blamed it on his foes the exact same way man. "9/11" is a page from the exact same play book.