those 4 paragraphs about bringing up a logical argument are more than you could write actually giving one.

ive tried myself, ive had so many none beleivers of the theories try and fail misserably.

answer how the buildings collapsed with such precision without being packed with explosives.... and also explain why fire fighters and demolishions experts said "it was as if somebody was sat pressing button after button to blow out the floors accordingly".

also explain why the government and "witnesses" said the plane hit the ground and slid across the pentagon lawn(GRASS) before hitting the building... yet in ALL the pictures the lawn was in perfect condition.

explain why this so called COMMERCIAL PLANE(passanger plane), had NO WINDOWS.. nore did it have COMMERCIAL MARKINGS...that basically takes the idea of it being commercial away.

also explain how the pittsburgh crash site had no wreckage and no bodies. and also why all emergency services exact words were "this looked nothing like a crash site... there was no wreckage nore bodies".

explain why all cctv footage from surrounding buildings was confiscated by the FBI and only 5 frames from a pentagon cctv camera were ever released, and even in that footage you can clearly see its not a plane.

explain why osama denied it, and then a blatantly fake video appears of him "admitting it was him"

spend less time talking about HOW you could argue it. and more time ACTUALLY argueing it.

its about time i saw you involved in a mature discussion.